Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: US primaries - could somebody explain?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default US primaries - could somebody explain?

    Just when I thought I had it all figured out...

    I thought these primaries were like the party nominations we have here, only with the direct approach instead of the representative approach here. But then I read an article in the paper today:

    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    ...The whole family is republicans, but both Karen Smith and Heather West plan to participate in the democrat nomination.
    - I'll vote for the candidate who will be the easiest for McCain to beat in November, And that's Barack Obama, says Karen.
    So what the hell? Republicans can vote for the democrat candidate? Or is this journalist a useless idiot?
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    What are you so surprised of?

  3. #3

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    Some primaries are open and allow that, others are closed.

  4. #4
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    That sounds.......seriously up.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 03-03-2008 at 20:43.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  5. #5
    Bureaucratically Efficient Senior Member TinCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    13,729

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    It varies by state. Generally, the idea is that it allows independants to have a say in the party they plan on voting for in the upcoming election. This is considered important to some people, because a large percentage of the US electorate is not registered in either party. AFAIK, most states with open primaries allow you to vote in whichever primary you want, but you can only vote in one.

    While it certainly opens up the system to exploitation by voters from the opposing party, from what I've seen this is probably not a serious risk. I live in Virginia, which has an open primary. After our voting, the reports I saw indicated that about 7 to 8% of the votes cast in the Democratic primary were by Republicans. Apparently this was a very high number. At least a couple of those percentage points are Republicans who truly do want to vote for a Democrat this year (I know one personally), so the percentage of votes by Republicans intentionally trying to 'rig' the election would not likely be higher than 5%.

    That's not a massive number, especially when you consider that those 'rigging' the vote aren't even coordinated very well in their efforts. As noted above, your quote is by a person who says that McCain is more likely to beat Obama than Clinton. This is directly contrary to most of the polls I have seen, which have Obama faring far better against McCain than Clinton would. My Republican friend who wants to vote Democrat specifically wants to vote for Obama. He'd vote Obama over McCain, but McCain over Clinton.

    It's a crazy year.


  6. #6
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,454

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    Horetore:

    Like pretty much everything electoral in the USA, it varies by state.

    Some states have closed primaries or caucuses and only those who are party members registered as such prior to a certain date may participate. This kind of primary or causus would function along the lines with which you are familiar. E.G. Wisconsin

    Other states have open primaries where a registered voter can request a ballot for either major political party and vote for the nominee of their choice. This approach to primaries and caucuses is usually taken on the grounds that "restricting" nomination voting to registered members of a party somehow denies the "will of the people" in selecting a nominee. E.G. Virginia


    In these latter states, especially after one's own party's nominee has been decided, it is strategically valuable to vote in the other party's primary in order to promote the candidate LEAST likely to do well in opposition to the nominee of your true party.

    I cast just such a vote in Virginia for Hilary Clinton.* McCain was already the almost prohibitively likely GOP nominee (at the time I voted, Huckabee needed to get 83% of the remaining delegates to defeat McCain. Absen pictures of McCain in bed with an underage boy, this would not happen) and therefore I cast my vote in the other primary to support a candidate who I know will turn out votes against her in November. Obama is every bit the political "lefty" she is, but doesn't have her high negatives. If my vote for Hil got her one delegate more, it gives her just that much more of a chance to turn the Dem nominating convention into a donnybrook.

    I am not a big fan of McCain either -- though I do not question his personal integrity in any way -- since he's too "big government" for my preferences. Nevertheless, he is less likely to lead my country down a path I mislike, so I'll take him over either leading Democrat. Therefore, voting for the Democrat more likely to lose to him in November was the most logical choice for me.


    Yes, labelling a primary system that allows such shenanigans as "malfed up" may be a fair description.



    * Additionally, as a Capo-II recruiting tool, I promised Louis I would vote for his preferred nominee so that he could legitimately claimed to have caused a vote on her behalf. A few days after I offered this promise, Romney dropped out and made it my best vote as well thus making it very easy to honor that promise to our French friend.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  7. #7
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh
    This approach to primaries and caucuses is usually taken on the grounds that "restricting" nomination voting to registered members of a party somehow denies the "will of the people" in selecting a nominee. E.G. Virginia
    Hmm? The president is elected by the will of the people... However, shouldn't a party's nominee be elected by the will of the party, not the people?

    But thanks for the clarifications, Seamus and Tincow. Although I'm sure I'll soon read another strange quirk of the american election throwing me into complete confusion again...

    Bah. "Land of the Free". Hah. Should've been "Land of the Tricky".
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  8. #8
    Needs more flowers Moderator drone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Moral High Grounds
    Posts
    9,286

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    The semi-closed primary system would be ideal. Registered party members have to vote in their own party primary, but independents can vote in either. Only one or two states do it though.
    The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions

    If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
    Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat

    "Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur

  9. #9
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: US primaries - could somebody explain?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
    Some primaries are open and allow that, others are closed.
    Open primaries are stupid, imo. Members of a party should be the ones who determine a candidate that best represents that party. Open primaries helped the GOP end up with McCain, and now it's leading to meddling in the Democrat primaries.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO