Castle II - Re-Entry [Concluded]

[Sarathos]

Welcome back Cimmerian, good to see you.

[Twilightblade]

Cmon guys 3 more people are needed

[Tran]

Count me in

[Crazed Rabbit]

Okay, I'm in.

CR

[Caius]

Join now, the last spot is for you ;)

[pevergreen]

One wonders if Cimmerian may pull himself far enough away from Pokemon to remain active?

[Killfr3nzy]

One wonders if pever will refrain from trying to break the game and/or actively pursue his role?
It would be most unusual for him to do so.

[shlin28]

One wonders if pever will refrain from trying to break the game and/or actively pursue his role?
It would be most unusual for him to do so.

What did he do last time?

[Craterus]

Just a thought: It might be a good idea to start this after Easter because some people might be going away, like me. Back on Monday evening.

[Killfr3nzy]

A fair point Craterus, and I still need another person. TBH I'd prefer Drac or Kommo, or some other random from the first game, but anyone would be fine.
@shlin; we all do it to some degree, but pever seems to make a habit of either trying to break the game or just being inactive in it. The second is easy to understand, but he decides to be inactive before he signs up, taking a spot some other player could enjoy, and perhaps a pivotal role. Also, we had a rage at each other in my last game, as he thought it would fail, and therefore suicided Day One. So yeah, a bit of bias there, but it's a response.

[Twilightblade]

Link to the Map in the first post updated

[Zorg]

That castle sure has a lot of blood in it haha. Those servants are really slacking off with their cleaning.

But the map looks fantastic, I esspecialy like the way you can zoom in.

[Killfr3nzy]

My idea, Dark's labour. Poor Bastard.

Anyway, while y'all enjoy the updatedness, someone wanna join? Not that it'd start right away you understand, I just want it filled....by people who will play. So no lurkers taking pity on me and signing up as their one and only action in this game.

[Sarathos]

someone wanna join?

May I join twice?

[Killfr3nzy]

No, but I could neuter your role. Like, if you really want me to.

Don't tell me I have to send out more recruitment Pm's...for one person.
Bah, here we go...

[Craterus]

Have you been advertising its former epicness?

[naut]

Last spot ay. I think Caius said he would a few posts ago, if not I'll fill it.

[Killfr3nzy]

Caius is indeed in, but so are you. Welcome to the party.
And that's it full, expect some kind of activity later today (like, intro story and role distribution).

EDIT; 'later today' now 'in 24 hrs'. Sorry guys but I've got some family issues.

[pevergreen]

@shlin; we all do it to some degree, but pever seems to make a habit of either trying to break the game or just being inactive in it. The second is easy to understand, but he decides to be inactive before he signs up, taking a spot some other player could enjoy, and perhaps a pivotal role. Also, we had a rage at each other in my last game, as he thought it would fail, and therefore suicided Day One. So yeah, a bit of bias there, but it's a response.

Hmmm. 1 game ive done that. Against 30 at least i havent.

[Killfr3nzy]

I'm sure I could find at least two instances, but I do and did admit my bias. Besides, this isn't the 'Bitch at/about other players' thread, so we should probably leave it alone now.

[Zain]

I can become active again for this game. May I join? Or am I too late?

[Caius]

I can become active again for this game. May I join? Or am I too late?

I think its too late man. Sorry.

Still I do not understand why teh limit.

[pevergreen]

Otherwise the write-ups will be take too long.

As said by Killfr3nzy.

[Sarathos]

Still I do not understand why teh limit.

We all have our limits Caius...

[Andres]

Besides, this isn't the 'Bitch at/about other players' thread, so we should probably leave it alone now.

Indeed

Now, when do we start?

[FactionHeir]

What's that talk about an Andres imposed limit about? Can't find it in this thread nor in the rule and queue threads. Personally I think there is no harm in allowing more willing players in if role have not yet been sent out and the limit (50) has not been reached.

[Twilightblade]

It's not a player restriction its a time limitation

[pevergreen]

Otherwise the write-ups will be take too long.

As said by Killfr3nzy.

Thats a direct quote from the hosts, this afternoon as we walked to the bus stop.

[Andres]

What's that talk about an Andres imposed limit about? Can't find it in this thread nor in the rule and queue threads. Personally I think there is no harm in allowing more willing players in if role have not yet been sent out and the limit (50) has not been reached.

Here

I think they are talking about the longitude of night/day phases who should not be longer then 48 hours at max.

If more players would participate, the hosts wouldn't be able to finish the extensive write-ups required for this game within said time limit.

In the past, extremely long rounds have been proven to be game killers, hence said rule.

Since everybody seems to miss it, I'll just sticky this thread

Any further discussion about general rules, please use said thread.

[FactionHeir]

Oh ok, I thought there was some kind of limit imposed on how long this game is allowed to last or its sign ups are allowed to last.
Am aware of the cycle limits, didn't think those would have been a major factor here but can certainly understand the host's view