I got my first ever triumph yesterday *initiates a series of pelvic thrusts*in the 262 bc against the old Carthies. This made me wonder what was the fastest ever triumph anyone obtained.
I got my first ever triumph yesterday *initiates a series of pelvic thrusts*in the 262 bc against the old Carthies. This made me wonder what was the fastest ever triumph anyone obtained.
Do you find something funny with the name Biggus Dickus?
in the EB PBeM
I suck, and have never had a Triumph. Ever.
Only a few seek liberty; the majority seek nothing more than fair masters - Sallust
A lie told often enough becomes truth - Vladimir Lenin
Me neither. I was at 172 BC in my last Romani campaign and I played it on H/H, which made the battles a bit more difficult. I always brought an entire legion to the fight (three Velites, three Hastati, three Principes, two Trarii, General and one or two cavalry) so I was never significantly outnumbered.
I can't remember what my earliest ever Triumph was, but I got about 7 of them before 240 B.C. on my 1.0 campaign. Could've gotten more, but I didn't want to get my faction leader (The 16 year old Cotta you get in the beginning of the campaign. I don't know why, but that Cotta always gets very nice traits so I always put him as my faction leader.) to keep going back after I got him about 4 triumphs.
Last edited by Korlon; 04-10-2008 at 18:35.
Ongoing EB Campaigns:
1.0 Pontos (245 BC)
Remanent or Supremacy - An EB Pontos AAR - Unfortunately postponed indefinitely.
1.1 Saka Rauka Gameplay Guide
1.1 Lusotannan Gameplay Guide
Triumphs are much more frequent in 1.1 than before, you should try it out. I think I had my earliest with Asina (can't remember the date, but it is one of the starting characters) in 1.1. - and never one before.
None yet to date...I am at 203BC and I just got my first Imperator trait...! I guess I'll have to go on a bit of a rampage with this guy to trigger the Triumphus...right?
I have seen the future and it is very much like the present, only longer -- Kehlog Albran, The Profit
It doesn't take a complete rampage, just concentrating all you force against one people through the same general. In mine, all I did was take Lilibeo, Alalia and Karali and defeat a full stack on Sicily.
Do you find something funny with the name Biggus Dickus?
in the EB PBeM
I know what a triumph is in Roman historical terms, but
not in the game.
Can someone enlighten me?
What do you get with a triumph (changes, benefits)?
Is this something unique to EB or also possible in vanilla rtw?
Update: Never mind. I found some EB literature just now.
Last edited by spqr_arcani; 04-11-2008 at 00:43.
Hmm.
So after reading the FAQ I'm still not sure why I would want a triumph aside
for its own sake.
The stuff I read teaches you how to attain one, but not really why or what comes with a triumph.
So, here we go again.
Why would you want a triumph? Generals die eventually anyway.
Is there a benefit to the faction?
Is it a cutscene?
Originally Posted by spqr_arcani
It's mostly for roleplaying purposes. You get +3 influence as a result of the triumph, but the general probably already have 10 influence by the time you get it anyhow, mine usually have somewhere close to 10 influence by the time they're offered the triumph.
Ongoing EB Campaigns:
1.0 Pontos (245 BC)
Remanent or Supremacy - An EB Pontos AAR - Unfortunately postponed indefinitely.
1.1 Saka Rauka Gameplay Guide
1.1 Lusotannan Gameplay Guide
No lie, I recieved a triumph in the year 256 against the Kart-Hadast. Pvblivs Cornelivs Svlla was his name. He became Imperator through beating back slaves in Italia, and "Conquerer of Kart-Hadast" or whatever it is after taking all of Sicily and Bocchoris. Of course, we lost Syracusia and took it back in a series of battles, but still it was pretty cool.
The Gods envy us.
They envy us because we are mortal, because any moment might be our last.
Everything is more beautiful because we are doomed.
You will never be lovlier than you are now.
We will never be here again.
I never recieved a triumph before 1.1 but i recieved it extreamly early, and did it fighting Elethuroi, fight a few stacks, no herioc victorys, took 2 of the northern settlements plus rhegion. Next thing its telling me to return him to rome to celebrate. I dont know for sure but it wasnt more than 4 - 5 years into the game.
I was under the impression that you couldn't get a triumph fighting Eleutheroi, that you would only get a lesser triumph.
Ongoing EB Campaigns:
1.0 Pontos (245 BC)
Remanent or Supremacy - An EB Pontos AAR - Unfortunately postponed indefinitely.
1.1 Saka Rauka Gameplay Guide
1.1 Lusotannan Gameplay Guide
I half recall getting an "ovation" or something like that for fighting Eleutheroi in EB1.0.
Or maybe I made that up, i can't remember.
If I remember correctly, Marcus Licinius Crassus was denied a Triumph for fighting Spartacus. I think you had to fight "foreigners" outside of Italy to be awarded a Triumph.
Last edited by Horst Nordfink; 04-12-2008 at 11:42.
Only a few seek liberty; the majority seek nothing more than fair masters - Sallust
A lie told often enough becomes truth - Vladimir Lenin
Just got one in 250BC in my 1.1 game:
After this battle:
![]()
Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 04-12-2008 at 19:24.
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
Bookmarks