No, he is using it as a counterpoint for saying that they should stick with Christian artefacts. Not that I've seen 4, I could well be wrong.Originally Posted by InsaneApache
No, he is using it as a counterpoint for saying that they should stick with Christian artefacts. Not that I've seen 4, I could well be wrong.Originally Posted by InsaneApache
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Technically, only the holy grail (3rd movie) had a Christian artifact. The Ark of the Covenant is Jewish, and the Sankara stones were Hindu.
Enough religion, back to your regularly scheduled Frontroom debate on Lucas' suckage.
The .Org's MTW Reference Guide Wiki - now taking comments, corrections, suggestions, and submissions
If I werent playing games Id be killing small animals at a higher rate than I am now - SFTS
Si je n'étais pas jouer à des jeux que je serais mort de petits animaux à un taux plus élevé que je suis maintenant - Louis VI The Fat
"Why do you hate the extremely limited Spartan version of freedom?" - Lemur
I thought the debate on Lucas was closed; the debate is what he did to this film.
Anyways, I haven't seen it and I don't think I want to see it in theaters - doesn't sound anywhere as good as the classic trilogy.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Sorry I shouldn't have said christian i meant Religious.
Tho' I've belted you an' flayed you,
By the livin' Gawd that made you,
You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!Originally Posted by North Korea
So, if I have to choose between Ironman or Indy 4, should I choose Ironman?
Last edited by woad&fangs; 05-23-2008 at 18:45.
Why did the chicken cross the road?
So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli
Originally Posted by woad&fangs
YES! Iron man was unusually good, and I usually hate superhero movies.
Haven't seen Indy, but there's no reason not to see Iron Man. Favourite movie I've seen in a while, endlessly quotable.
"The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr
As quoteable as 300?Originally Posted by Geoffrey S
I walked out of the theater trying to convince myself that I didn't hate it, but I failed. I did hate it. The script was average, the acting was phoned-in, and the plot... oh my. The movie had no energy at all. The original movies had a spark that made them feel very improvised (and some parts actually were!). The dialog was natural and easy and the characters felt like real people. This movie had none of that. Almost every single line felt like it was being read dead-pan off of cue cards. Some of the 'stunts' were absolutely absurd. The Indy films were action oriented, but the danger situations were generally plausible (at least, the non-supernatural ones). Not so in Indy 4. The films forces you to suspend your disbelief almost immediately, because it blatantly makes all characters invincible. There is one particular scene early on where Indy pretty much shrugs off a... uh... large explosion... as if nothing had happened. Using such an event as a 'minor' danger that is tangential to the plotline is a travesty.
This is not the Indy I grew up with.
Last edited by TinCow; 05-24-2008 at 14:03.
Bookmarks