Quote Originally Posted by Ichigo View Post
Everyone changes votes throughout the game, just because CA did it more, how did that make him more suspicious? It was the first round so there's not much to go on, and so you'd expect people to make multiple vote changes.

That's just funny. It's their fault that you voted for them. You make me laugh Everyone has different things they think make someone suspicious. It's all your own judgment, not their fault your judgment was bad.

Like I said before what you think may be scummy, may not be to them.
Yes, people are responsible for their actions in the thread. (or lack of actions as the case may be.)

With so little real evidence to go on, I vote for people based on their actions. I don't like abstaining or meatballing so I try to find real reasons to vote. Even on D1. In my opinion, this is more helpful than just abstaining. So the person I voted for ended up being powertown. I did not know that at the time and their actions were incrementally more suspcious than other actions.

I admit the matter of what is "suspicious" is highly subjective but what else are we supposed to do?

As for GH, he seems less Jotun the more he argues. I am more convinced he is a bored townie. But that does not negate the fact that Holmgangs seem to do more harm to the town than good.

If it is true that a Holmgang will not reveal a Jotun, then we can't even use it for that reason. The only thing we can use it for is to have the tiny chance of killing a Jotun. But that is only if one chooses to fight. It seems that we are far more likely to slaughter each other using the Holmgang. And I am sure the Jotun are sitting back and laughing their heads off as we do it. Because every townie that dies in Holmgang makes their job easier. Just like every townie that dies by WoG makes their job easier.