Eek....
If Igno has indeed completed all prioritized buildings, he is technically correct. Unfortunately, the wording of 4.3 skews from what was intended, as far as I can remember it. 4.3 specifically states that RAs and PAs take priority over "military recruitment." This definitely doesn't cover buildings. Megas' Limitation #2 also only specifically states that 4.3 takes priority over "prioritized buildings," not all construction in general. Thus, completing all prioritized buildings makes this bit inoperative.
Technically, as the rules are currently written, I think Igno is correct (assuming he has finished all prioritized buildings). This is, however, a loophole in the rules and not how it was intended to operate. I will propose a CA to fix this problem at the next Senate session (not too far off). For now, Igno has not technically violated a rule as far as I can tell. I would greatly appreciate it the spirit of the law, rather than the letter, would be obeyed until this can be rectified.
Sorry for the multiple posts, they come at various levels of caffeination.
Bookmarks