I don't think setting the investigator on me is a good idea, for the following reasons:
First let me make this clear that I only saying this for the town's sake and not because I'm afraid of being found ouf or anything.
-Firstly I'm not sure if we even have an investigator
Oh... jeez.... GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!!!
How would you know that unless you know there is an investigator?-Secondly there will be a fair chance of him finding me to be 'unclear', and I doubt the town will take anything short of innocent to think me as innocent.
Ummm..... How about the investigator just remains silent, then?-Finally, and most importantly. If we do have an investigator then I'm positive there is only one investigator. Since private reveal isn't allowed then the only way he could pronouce my innocence is by saying: "Hello everyone, I'm ***** the detective, I've investigated QJC and found him innocent. Ta". And as we can expect, we'll find the detective dead the very next day. There is no way the detective can reveal whether I'm innocent or not without exposing himself, and therefore putting himself in the hands of the mafia, it isn't worth the investigator's life just to prove whether I'm innocent. So I think the best way to prove me not lying is to send the vigilante on me, the advantages of that are:
SO guilty.
You just said that would be a waste of time. It makes no sense to do what you propose.-It's still Night 1, the chance of killing the mafia is very, very low. The vigilante could only have a blind guess and the chances are that he'll end up killing an innocent townie because there are more townies than scums. So the vigilante might as well deal with me on Night 1, so that no innocent townie is put in danger.
What if you're right, and the vigilante can't kill you, but you can only be lynched? That still doesn't prove your innocence.-Vigilante will have a sure result, unlike investigators they won't have the chances of 'unclear' or as such. They will succed in attempting to kill me, they will NOT fail.
I refer you to your own warning that it can't work. And I already showed you that the detective doesnt have to DO anything if youre innocent.-The vigilante will be able to kill me without exposing himself, unlike the detective. All we need to see is Chaotix's right up to know what happend, but the detective have to publicly reveal himself, putting his live in danger.
That does NOT make any sense. You can suggest the mafia wouldnt need extra lives, but I contend that they are a great candidate for such a trait. ESPECIALLY IF THEY REVEAL IT ON TURN ONE.-After surviving his attacks I will be left with 2 lifes, I think everyone should know that the host would not give the mafia an extra life because he would not need it, never mind 3 lives. So that would prove my innocence. None the less, if the town is still not statisified then they can set the vigilante on me two more times, though I doubt that would do much good for the town.
Ignore him! This defense does not have the necessary underlying logic. He's not on the chopping block anyway, Caius is, and the investigation will see him innocent or guilty.So I advise the investigator to drop his investigation and let the vigilante stretch his muscles before the real work needs to be done.
From what he's saying, I think he's guilty. We shall soon find out.
Bookmarks