Transgression

[FactionHeir]

Hmm play modded, then the relations do have an impact

Get off my land would be an interesting feature in that regard, but the target faction could just say "whatever, i won't get off your land, come and get me!" though?

[Quintus.JC]

I think I read in one of the Empire previews that they are adding in a "get off my land" diplomatic offer/thingy. I personally think they should adopt an EU3 aproach, where other nations can only move onto your lands if they are at war or have military access...I feel that military access is extremely pointless in M2, especially as your relations with factions have little effect on anything crucial to gameplay.

That's the idea, Military access in MII is totally useless. That feature would be very welcome.

Hmm play modded, then the relations do have an impact

Get off my land would be an interesting feature in that regard, but the target faction could just say "whatever, i won't get off your land, come and get me!" though?

Then they are being unreasonable and that should count as a declearation of war.

[ArtistofWarfare]

That's the idea, Military access in MII is totally useless. That feature would be very welcome.



Then they are being unreasonable and that should count as a declearation of war.

These "grey areas" as far as who the aggressor is needs to be something the other AI factions also take into consideration.

Depending upon all of the factors in the current campaign (alliances, former wars, current wars, ...everything) coalitions should be formed based off of how they view the events unfolding and how they want to get involved.

Economic sanctions, Naval attacks/blockades, sending soldiers off to be commanded by an ally faction in their own war, full blown military involvement etc- should all be options that any faction can contemplate regarding how involved they get.

[Lancome]

Really- isnt that alrealy called The U.N.