What's your alignment?

[Sarathos]

Im too nice

Neutral Good

A neutral good character does the best that a good person can do. He is devoted to helping others. He works with kings and magistrates but does not feel beholden to them. The common phrase for neutral good is "true good." Neutral good is the best alignment you can be because it means doing what is good without bias toward or against order.

Btw, how do you add a spoiler?

[pevergreen]

[SPOIL][/SPOIL]

Bah, thats the first 4 people to answer/that ive asked and they are all the same.

True, there is only 9 alignments and the evil 3 ones are off limits to Players in D'n'D, but that didnt stop me.

[naut]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Neutral

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. He doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, he would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, he’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.

[Togakure]

NG here. Guess I am in my good persona today. My alignment vacillates between NG and NC.

Meh, I don't think the questions effectively assess alignment. I was a DM back in the late 70s and early 80s, made real money doing it. You'd need more questions, better questions, and more options in the answers to do a proper job of it. The survey is still fun I guess.

Players can't be evil?? Since when? I guess things have changes radically since I played. Heh, in 25 years ... yeah, probably so.

[pevergreen]

Well, the general rules (before ruleset 4) was that only enemies got the evil line. Makes it more fun if you have a lawful evil rogue in a party with a Lawful Good paladin.

[Togakure]

Well, the general rules (before ruleset 4) was that only enemies got the evil line. Makes it more fun if you have a lawful evil rogue in a party with a Lawful Good paladin.

Oh indeed, especially as alignments were concealed unless players chose to reveal them. Some of the BEST entertainment for me as DM was what they did to each other. D&D brings out the absolute worst in people, lol. We had to keep guys from pummeling each other on more than a few occasions.

[Kekvit Irae]

Personally? I often switch personalities between Lawful Evil, Lawful Neutral, and Neutral Good. I'm weird like that.

[FactionHeir]

I think last time I took that test (a few years back) I got NG.

In game, I usually play LN or NG. In rare cases also LG and NE. Don't like Chaotic much.