Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Need newer game, please recommend.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I stole it from a stupid Iceni Member Shieldmaiden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England, Lincolnshire.
    Posts
    340

    Default Re: Need newer game, please recommend.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zenicetus View Post
    Have you tried Galactic Civilizations 2? It's the best strategy game I've played in the last few years. It's pure strategy; turn-based, with no tactical layer (you don't control ships in space battles). There is a campaign, but it's really just a trainer for the game mechanics. It's basically a sandbox strategy game, where you can set up different-sized, randomized game maps. The AI is very good, and the last expansion adds unique tech trees for each race. Don't get it without that expansion (Twilight of the Arnor). No copy protection, although you have to register and use their online service for updates.
    I'm thinking of buying Galactic Civilizations 2: Ultimate Edition for Christmas.

    Does it feel like Master of Orion 2? Cos if yes warp 10 captain
    "Now, once more I must ride with my knights, to defend what was and the dream of what could be..."

    - King Arthur, Excalibur

  2. #2
    Member Member Zenicetus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    On a ship, in a storm
    Posts
    906

    Default Re: Need newer game, please recommend.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shieldmaiden View Post
    I'm thinking of buying Galactic Civilizations 2: Ultimate Edition for Christmas.

    Does it feel like Master of Orion 2? Cos if yes warp 10 captain
    Well, it doesn't have tactical ship combat where you can control individual ships and determine the outcome. You're in charge of strategy -- you decide what types of ships to construct (and there is a great custom ship building module!), how many to put in a fleet, where those ships should be deployed for offense or defense. You can decide whether to initiate a battle if you have the movement points to reach an enemy fleet or target. When a battle starts, the results are auto-calculated by comparing stats of the two fleets. You can then watch a 3D movie of the actual battle, but the results are pre-determined by number crunching. So it lacks that hands-on space battle element in MOO, but I think it makes up for it with the overall depth of the game and AI quality.

    Also, space battles aren't always central to winning a GalCiv2 game. There are two military-intensive paths: either raw territorial conquest through planetary invasion, or capturing and defending special resources scattered across the galaxy (which upsets all the other races when you get far enough down that path). Both require a lot of space combat. But there are also two other ways to win the game: cultural domination where you "flip" planetary systems to your side because you're just too cool and everyone likes your culture, or going far enough down the path of science research to reach a God-like state that triggers the tech win condition. Both of those win conditions require a strong military to keep other races off your back. However, I've played through a few games where it basically meant designing and building the right kind of ships to intimidate the other races, playing some background diplomatic games (like getting other races to go to war with each other), and never had to fight any major battles myself.
    Feaw is a weapon.... wise genewuhs use weuuhw! -- Jebe the Tyrant

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO