I don't understand being butt hurt about cops being recorded. They record us. They record themselves.

The vast majority of police misonduct convictions stem from recorded evidence. Does this mean that misconduct never existed before recorders? A cops word will trump the word of 6 eye witnesses, and I am not saying that is a bad thing. Recording is a form of checks and balances. How many clear-cut cases of misconduct caught-on-tape situations do we need before people stop expecting cops to recieve immunity from the constitution? We have tougher ROEs in war zones that most cops do these days.