Why, specifically, are you leaving out segments of my quotes? Any reason besides it leaves out clarification on your previous statements, and thus making the subject narrower and easier to handle?
I'll look at other suspects as well, but your here to be questioned and are always willing to answer.
So lets start -
Post 483
An attempt to analyze the write up - no issue here, normal townie behavior, even though you admit there is nothing to go on - Andres doesn't usually give ANY clues, if at all however.
Post 504
Again, another attempt to analyze the write up, yet your analysis contains faulty logic - your quick to assume and assign rational to Ichigo's vote, yet, if what you said is true, then it would, you know, make sense that Ichigo would either A) not make his case so early, and bide his time to find another, or B) bring his case forward to get the mafioso lynched - available doctors can then protect him.
If you make the argument that Ichigo would not play it that way because he likes to be random, then you can't assign any logic to his vote, since why he did is "random". You were looking for a way to make an easy case against someone and place a vote, even if the case was upon shaky ground, at best.
Post 566
Your previous attempt is foiled! AMG!! Because traitors and ninjas are not aligned? Wasn't this common knowledge? It was shown that the traitors were not only new to the game, but also independent of the ninjas in motivation. Your analysis was originally based on the assumption as well that the Ninja and Samurai operated as two separate entities. Hmmm...
Post 586
The main reason was that your case against GH was flawed initially - no one was going to follow it when it was based on a false assumption. But why jump on Sigurd specifically? I don't see a reason that would have negated you from not jumping on the "stupidly large bandwagon".
Post 596
You attempt to explain your reasoning for voting for Sigurd. It's fine as is, but 3 is a pressure vote? Not usually, that's more like it's under serious consideration by a few people. And Yaropolk was the only option? In a game with only half the people posting? They aren't lurking at all? No, but Sigurd is a strong player, and a good one at analyzing behavioral patterns. He is also known for being less active once killed off when not having a role, rather convenient, especially if he really is just to busy to come and post.
Post 601
You assert dueling hurts the town - no issue here, it's your personal opinion, nothing more, and it has a fair chance of being right.
Post 609
Asking for duel scores - can whatever they tell you be considered truthful? Won't trying to analyze what they tell and whether or not they are lying lead to WIFOM? How is this actually helpful, except to eliminate a target for the mafioso?
Post 615
Wow we move fast - first none productive and bordering on self-destructive, it can now be used to find mafioso! But wait, isn't that the opposite of what you asserted before?
Post 781
Pointless post made about eliminating players who annoy you because they changed their username. This one just simply smells scummy to me, and I can't quite articulate why.
Post 789
Whoops, dueling is bad again. You won't actively discourage it though, or create a process to control it. Hmmm.....
Post 806
You acting as if you had not read the write up, when, to assert that a large portion of the "pevers" were already dead, you'd have to read the write up. Your making a statement that you could have paired with Post 781, it would have been obvious had you checked the alive or dead list, and your running over something you asserted earlier and should be obvious - the ninjas are working together.
This whole thing feels sloppy and/or scummy. Also, anyone having pad attention will notice the groupings by which hour the kills take place, so this was, essentially, a null point your trying to make - your being idle while looking helpful, just as you were with the dueling, just like the round when Stephen was under pressure.
Post 817
First you state that Andres prioritizes them in such a way so that all night actions happen each night, which is technically impossible since in gaming terms mafia actions have a higher priority then non-mafia actions for ability resolution. But I digress - you quickly switch to the assertion that each is then order from top to bottom in chronological order. But if this is true, then that breaks the prioritization based on getting in all abilities - each hour set is dominated by one faction, not broken up so all act individually - there is to much consistency on how the kills are managed for it not to be a "Ninja's kill first, Traitors/SK's kill second".
And as the votes for me being a surviving Pever - your argument can be turned upon it's head and be stated that it was done to MAKE me a target. Indeed, by renaming myself "PeverYellow" to have some fun, I unwittingly made myself a target. And ask Pevergreen himself, I volunteered, that was all - I recruited no one, and was recruited by Pevergreen himself. And if I has used it to make it make me less suspicious, then I would end up only being made looking suspicious and attempting to use WIFOM - better kill him instead. Either case results in me becoming lynched.
I'd FoS you but that includes Reenk, and Reenk is at least being logical in following his "master", even if the reasoning is faulty.
Bookmarks