Swords in the Moon [Concluded]

**TinCow** · 04-24-2009, 23:13

Originally Posted by woad&fangs

There are a lot of reasons a person could be PMing that have nothing to do with Swords in the Moon. The fact that Ajax has visited Andres user page is also not very incriminating. In large games like this, someone always gets incriminated with this kind of evidence and it is always WRONG.

True, but Stephen Asen said Ajax was regularly switching between viewing this thread and PMing. That's pretty solid evidence that he was PMing about this game. You and Sasaki are both correct that this in itself is not really incriminating and we should not lynch for it. However, it is worth probing for more information. If the PMing was innocent and meaningless, then it shouldn't be hard to prove.

Incidentally, this is why it is good to turn invisibility on.

**woad&fangs** · 04-24-2009, 23:16

I actually agree with what you are saying. I made that post because I thought the day phase would be ending soon and if Ajax was suspected of having a role, the ninjas/samurai would kill him during the night which would be bad if he turned out to be pro town. However, now that I realize this is an extended day phase, I think that we should continue to pressure Ajax.

**Chimpyang** · 04-24-2009, 23:29

Originally Posted by TinCow

True, but Stephen Asen said Ajax was regularly switching between viewing this thread and PMing. That's pretty solid evidence that he was PMing about this game. You and Sasaki are both correct that this in itself is not really incriminating and we should not lynch for it. However, it is worth probing for more information. If the PMing was innocent and meaningless, then it shouldn't be hard to prove.

Incidentally, this is why it is good to turn invisibility on.

Surely this would be a good reason for pro-town roles to switch invisibility off? If PMing is innocent - it should as you say to be provable - unless you have something to hide/need to make something up.

**FactionHeir** · 04-25-2009, 00:10

Originally Posted by Chimpyang

Surely this would be a good reason for pro-town roles to switch invisibility off? If PMing is innocent - it should as you say to be provable - unless you have something to hide/need to make something up.

Care to explain why a bit earlier in the thread you switched invisibility off and called on everyone else to follow suit and now say the exact opposite?

**Chimpyang** · 04-25-2009, 08:17

Originally Posted by FactionHeir

Care to explain why a bit earlier in the thread you switched invisibility off and called on everyone else to follow suit and now say the exact opposite?

How is that the complete opposite? I am still calling for people to switch invisibility off as it is the aniti town roles that have the most to lose from it. I'm sorry, but hoping to pin me to something from you has gotten a bit desperate now.

**Prince Cobra** · 04-25-2009, 08:27

Vote:Abstain

Although utterly disappointed by the lack of honour in shlin's behaviour.

Edit: The die is cast and the challenge won't be withdrawn