Quote Originally Posted by glyphz View Post
It would seem that TinCow is in the position, 'Killed if you lose, damned if you win.' Can't tell whether he's innocent or not...
I understand glyphz. I posted about the combat system/ratings and the role PMs because they seemed like things generating a lot of useless discussion when perhaps we should be looking elsewhere for clues. There is still too much gut and not enough brain in most of the accusations. To be fair, there doesn't seem like much for the brain to latch on to yet, but wonder how much research is being devoted to seeking brain food. Sasaki's case against TinCow and his flip-flops looks pretty incrimnating but it seems even that type of evidence can have legitimate or concocted explanations for the activities. So evidence that is less player behaviour related is better. Unfortunately it seems scarce too.

I've re-read each of the killing, duel and lynching writeups looking for subtle clues that might give us a tip. The few anomalies I noted hadn't yielded anything useful though.