Quote Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief View Post

I do request that the people actually read my allegations against Rhyfelwyr as if they were made by a dead townie trying to help, and not go into it looking for ways to point to my guilt.
I read your case on rhyf.

1. He survived the pever massacre.
You accuse him of killing all the other pever's to leave himself one of the few alive.

2. He voted LG for trying to draw attention to the fact that there were survivors.
He is upset that people point out that there are survivors?

3. He claims watching the game for a while but apparently hasn't seen anything worth commenting on. Again, I ask: How many of you guys, as mafiosi, have often had trouble creating a reasoning for voting somebody?
He lurked this game and

4. When it looked like he was going to get lynched for a while, his activity jumped and he got very agitated.
When voted he got interested?

3&4 and standard op for many people. Many people lurk (particularly this game) and most's people have a jump in activity after they are accused. You yourself claimed to be not following the game closely in the early rounds, and bumped up your activity towards the endgame.

1&2 don't make sense. There's no reason to assume he killed the pever's to create a wifom "I wouldn't have left myself as one of the few survivor's" scenario. The ninja's could only kill 3 of the pever's, so of course there are survivors. One could just as easily say that you killed the pever's because it creates a wifom as well, what with your vendetta against them.

Rhyf's vote against LG was a one liner. He didn't even reply to LG's response as far as I can see. And it's perfectly legitimate to say that it's silly to vote someone for being a surviving pever. LG was going after YLC anyway, not Rhyf.

He votes LG again next round but it's a one liner vote again. What's his plan with this as mafia supposed to be?