This, too, is predictable. "We never did it. Okay, we did it, but it wasn't torture. Okay, maybe it was torture, but we did it really briefly, so don't get upset. Okay, maybe we did it hundreds of times, but it was worth it."
Honestly, I think there are only two questions left:
- Was it as efficient as the torture apologists claim in yielding useful, confirmable intel? We all know torture is the best tool available for breaking a man. What stands untested and unproved is whether it yields better results than traditional interrogation in terms of actionable intelligence.
- Will anyone above the rank of Sergeant ever be held accountable?
Bookmarks