I can't help but mention the agencies that approved of waterboarding; you'll note that the Wermacht are missing. They famously refused to torture captives. Sorry I had to include two NSDAP agencies on the list, but there haven't been very many polities that approved of waterboarding. Needs must.
This is a new an unexpected development. The Convention Against Torture does not mention sex. Neither does the Geneva Convention. Your opinion is your opinion and nothing more, o subject of a state that (by your own argument) has the right to detain you indefinitely and torture you the entire time, while never filing charges. Your opinion is meaningless before the unlimited power of the state you support. That which is not explicitly forbidden is permitted. So prepare to be legally sodomized.
(Dang it ! I forgot to mention Imperial Japan! Bad Lemur!) What a fool I was, to compare waterboarding to waterboarding. It's like comparing apples to apples or something equally insane. And as I have clearly established, with primary documentation in this thread, plenty of people did die in our "enhanced interrogations," so the difference ... hmmm ...
Clear as mud. Why are you including sodomy on the list? Your inconsistencies, if spun and attached to a turbine, could power a Kansas town.
Now that you've proved that waterboarding is not torture (that is, the waterboarding we do, not the waterboarding they do) it's time to move on! Have your friends move you through various stress positions until you collapse, then hit you until you get up again, while keeping you awake for eleven days. I can't wait to hear how it's not torture.
Bookmarks