Results 1 to 30 of 171

Thread: The weakest argument for gun ownership in the USA

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: The weakest argument for gun ownership in the USA

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddling_nero View Post
    It is implied that the current makeup of the military, being an all volunteer force, would have some patriots in it.
    It is implied that any wannabe despot would redefine the meaning of "patriotism" to mean supporting the dictator. Anyone who doesn't support said despot would be labeled traitors, and would be fair game for every "patriot".

    It's a fact that 9 million lives have been saved by the 2nd amendment. Maybe you should have read up on that.
    How 'bout giving some sources on that? Please note; only studies performed by non-partisan organizations will be accepted...
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: The weakest argument for gun ownership in the USA

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    How 'bout giving some sources on that? Please note; only studies performed by non-partisan organizations will be accepted...
    Don't bother asking; Sasaki is not actually participating in a thread when he does his "9 million" thing; it's his personal, private joke.

    To those who say an armed populace does not deter a modern military, take a look at how much trouble we had with people armed with AKs and explosives in Iraq. Although given that example, to deter tyranny we need fewer hunting rifles and more plastique.

    Besides which, the gun control debate is kind of silly. There are millions (9 million?) firearms in the U.S.A., and they don't expire like milk. Our population is armed, and any talk of disarming them is fantasy-land wishful thinking. Better to talk about how to enforce existing laws and have as few firearms as possible land in the hands of the criminal and the insane.

    The Repubs don't back gun control, and these days it looks as though the Dems don't either. Dead issue.

  3. #3
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: The weakest argument for gun ownership in the USA

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    To those who say an armed populace does not deter a modern military, take a look at how much trouble we had with people armed with AKs and explosives in Iraq. Although given that example, to deter tyranny we need fewer hunting rifles and more plastique.
    Two things:

    - As shown by both Iraq and Afghanistan, a crazy amount of insurgents did not deter the US in the slightest.
    - Secondly, you think Joe Iraqi had his house stuffed with c-4, RPG's and so on before the invasion? He didn't, nor did he need to, since an invasion creates a power vacuum for looting, as well as allies(Iran, Syria, etc etc) willing to give you a bunch of stuff for free. Also, there seems to be an unending supply of black market ex-soviet weapons...
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO