Results 1 to 30 of 62

Thread: What is different in 1.3?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Cheetah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,085

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheogorath View Post
    In one battle it did try to flank me with some cavalry, but since I turned an infantry unit to face them the cavalry just sort of ran a circle around my army, then rode off back to the main force.
    This is what you would have done in the place of the cavalry commander is not it?
    Lional of Cornwall
    proud member of the Round Table Knights
    ___________________________________
    Death before dishonour.

    "If you wish to weaken the enemy's sword, move first, fly in and cut!" - Ueshiba Morihei O-Sensei

  2. #2
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    It would seem intellegent until you realise that the AI ALWAYS tries to do that. So in effect it has finally been wrong enough times for the proper situation to come up for it to get the right answer. To put it another way, it just bubbled in C for all the test questions.

    I will however say that this is the first time that I have seen or heard of the AI withdrawing its cavalry instead of finding something to suicide them on.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  3. #3
    Member Member Mumu Champion Prodigal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    578

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Battle field range finder is red/orange, a small but staggeringly important change.

    Cannons fire on a very low trajectory.

    Getting a viable navy is a must.

  4. #4
    Member Member Zarky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    381

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Don't know if this is official but auto-resolve seems to be easier.
    Homo Sapiens non Urinat in Ventum - the wise man does not piss against the wind.

  5. #5
    The Dam Dog Senior Member Sheogorath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,330

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Autoresolve seems to give a LOT more weight to cavalry now. Does AR just automatically throw everybody into melee and skip over the ranged combat or something?
    Tallyho lads, rape the houses and burn the women! Leave not a single potted plant alive! Full speed ahead and damn the cheesemongers!

  6. #6
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Line infantry does not use fire by rank against cavalry anymore, only the first rank fires as if you hadn't researched fire by rank, against infantry etc they still use fire by rank.
    I guess it makes sense since you wouldn't want to kneel down facing a bunch of horses.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  7. #7
    Member Member Lucius Verenus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East of Madagascar, West of Kalgoorlie
    Posts
    34

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    Line infantry does not use fire by rank against cavalry anymore, only the first rank fires as if you hadn't researched fire by rank, against infantry etc they still use fire by rank.
    I guess it makes sense since you wouldn't want to kneel down facing a bunch of horses.
    Couldnt let that go by - it is, in fact, exactly what you would do if threatened by cavalry in Line formation and couldn't, (or so far in this game can't be bothered to), form a square.

    As long as your flanks are secured then a line of kneeling infantry holding grounded muskets with the bayonet pointed up and out and another rank standing behind them would deter any cavalry. Unlike in this game horses will NOT charge a dense line of pointy things

    Sig..

  8. #8
    Senior Member Senior Member Cheetah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,085

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky View Post
    It would seem intellegent until you realise that the AI ALWAYS tries to do that. So in effect it has finally been wrong enough times for the proper situation to come up for it to get the right answer. To put it another way, it just bubbled in C for all the test questions.

    I will however say that this is the first time that I have seen or heard of the AI withdrawing its cavalry instead of finding something to suicide them on.
    Fact is that the AI has fairly decent priorities when it comes picking a target for a charge. For example I noticed that native lancers always charge the moving units (even if it is on the other flank) and not the stationary ones (ofc facing the lancers). Also lancers avoid pikemen at all cost (which ofc can be exploited by the player). So just because an experinced player can outsmart the AI it does not mean that the AI is utterly dumb.
    The real test would be letting someone fight the AI who never seen a TW battle. Actually, IIRC someone did that with the vanilla game and the player was trashed in all battles.
    Lional of Cornwall
    proud member of the Round Table Knights
    ___________________________________
    Death before dishonour.

    "If you wish to weaken the enemy's sword, move first, fly in and cut!" - Ueshiba Morihei O-Sensei

  9. #9
    Slixpoitation Member A Very Super Market's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada, North America, Terra, Sol, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Universe
    Posts
    3,700

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    I'm fairly certain that the auto-balancer measure only takes into account the units, not the experience. With an experienced army, I've won several auto-resolves against bad odds and bad soldiers.

    Edit: Hell, I think the measure is only based on the number of men, with a multiplier for cavalry and artillery. Six units of Desert Warriors does not equal 3 of line infantry, 2 Provincial cavalry regiments, and a 24-pounder.
    Last edited by A Very Super Market; 06-26-2009 at 17:15.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    WELCOME TO AVSM
    Cool store, bro! I want some ham.
    No ham, pepsi.
    They make deli slices of frozen pepsi now? Awesome!
    You also need to purchase a small freezer for storage of your pepsi.
    It runs on batteries. You'll need a few.
    Uhh, I guess I won't have pepsi then. Do you have change for a twenty?
    You can sift through the penny jar
    ALL WILL BE CONTINUED

    - Proud Horseman of the Presence

  10. #10

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    The most significant difference is that trade spots are not safe harbors. The great indiaman-spam of 1700-05 is now a frantic game of trade-and-run.

    Also, the AI will attack much more. My poor little Prussia is getting squashed between Hanover, Saxony, Austria, and Courland. However, the attacks are neither coordinated nor intelligent.
    Last edited by jsberry; 06-26-2009 at 17:28.

  11. #11

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheetah View Post
    Fact is that the AI has fairly decent priorities when it comes picking a target for a charge. For example I noticed that native lancers always charge the moving units (even if it is on the other flank) and not the stationary ones (ofc facing the lancers). Also lancers avoid pikemen at all cost (which ofc can be exploited by the player). So just because an experinced player can outsmart the AI it does not mean that the AI is utterly dumb.
    The real test would be letting someone fight the AI who never seen a TW battle. Actually, IIRC someone did that with the vanilla game and the player was trashed in all battles.
    I agree here; The AI has some decent basic tactics down, that most TW players know how to deal with/exploit, or at the very least predict. Most of my friends don't play this game (because of the system requirements, no surprise there), but when they do play a battle unsupervised, it usually ends very badly.

  12. #12
    The Red Tezcatlipoca Member Xipe Totec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cholula
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    I didn't predict a half stack of Streltsy appearing 'as if by magic' in the forests north of Muscovy (20 years after I conquered it) and nicking my beloved Moscow the minute my back was turned. All Sweden was outraged by this blatant cheating! My attempt to recapture it unleashed another video memory CTD
    Last edited by Xipe Totec; 06-27-2009 at 08:49. Reason: Victory! Now I have -30 happiness penalty again uurgh.
    'I go forth about to destroy ... I am seen in the golden water; I shall appear unto mortals; I shall strengthen them for the words of war!'

    Hymn of the High Priest of Xipe Totec.

  13. #13
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheetah View Post
    Fact is that the AI has fairly decent priorities when it comes picking a target for a charge. For example I noticed that native lancers always charge the moving units (even if it is on the other flank) and not the stationary ones (ofc facing the lancers). Also lancers avoid pikemen at all cost (which ofc can be exploited by the player). So just because an experinced player can outsmart the AI it does not mean that the AI is utterly dumb.
    The real test would be letting someone fight the AI who never seen a TW battle. Actually, IIRC someone did that with the vanilla game and the player was trashed in all battles.
    Well I do agree with that. The AI isn't terrible unless it bugs out, sits in a ball, and dies or something stupid.

    I've just never liked the fact that the AI sends cav in piecemeal and has tunnel vision when it finally picks a target. Suicide runs are annoying.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  14. #14
    The Red Tezcatlipoca Member Xipe Totec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cholula
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Pre-patch playing as Prussia I faced stacks of predominantly line infantry from Austria and Poland and had some really epic battles. Post patch playing as Sweden I have fought Poland to extinction and am facing a huge bloated Austrian Empire. Both have built almost nothing but pandours with their annoying extra long range muskets and silly garden gnomish attire. Their melee defence and morale are so bad they run away too easily and are easy prey for Swedish heavy cavalry out in the open. Has the increase in range caused the AI to over-value them and thus spam the pesky Pandoras?
    'I go forth about to destroy ... I am seen in the golden water; I shall appear unto mortals; I shall strengthen them for the words of war!'

    Hymn of the High Priest of Xipe Totec.

  15. #15
    Grand Patron's Banner Bearer Senior Member Peasant Phill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somewhere relatively safe, behind some one else, preferably at the back
    Posts
    2,953
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Austria already spammed pandours in 1.2.
    Conquering Vienna as Prussia was a walk in the park when it's defended by nothing else than pandours and citizens.
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone
    Someone has to watch over the wheat.
    Quote Originally Posted by TinCow
    We've made our walls sufficiently thick that we don't even hear the wet thuds of them bashing their brains against the outer wall and falling as lifeless corpses into our bottomless moat.

  16. #16
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheetah View Post
    Fact is that the AI has fairly decent priorities when it comes picking a target for a charge. For example I noticed that native lancers always charge the moving units (even if it is on the other flank) and not the stationary ones (ofc facing the lancers). Also lancers avoid pikemen at all cost (which ofc can be exploited by the player). So just because an experinced player can outsmart the AI it does not mean that the AI is utterly dumb.
    The real test would be letting someone fight the AI who never seen a TW battle. Actually, IIRC someone did that with the vanilla game and the player was trashed in all battles.
    Well the problem I have with the battlefield AI is that it doesn't always get proper units by the strategic AI, if it actually employs line infantry in a line then yes, it can be very challenging, but often it doesn't have access to decent units and then when it does, i often see it park some of it's best infantry in buildings....
    Since a lot of battliefields have buildings, that can ruin a lot of battles for the AI...

    Oh and then it sometimes shuffles units around like a bunch of scared rabbits, hides some far away behind a fence too far away from it's main force etc. so I can just takes them out piecemeal or how you say. Those new features are nice but they also ruin the battlefield AI in way too many battles I've seen, I think I lost a lot more naval battles than land battles and find the naval part way more satisfying in general.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  17. #17
    Relentless Bughunter Senior Member FactionHeir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8,115

    Default Re: What is different in 1.3?

    I've been checking units stats a bit in custom battles and I noticed Holland Guards have 5 more accuracy than any other guard unit (55 vs 50).
    Also, for France, their Petit-Vieux infantry has 55 accuracy while their Vieux infantry defaults back to 50. Rather strange considering Vieux is supposed to be better than Petit-Vieux.
    Want gunpowder, mongols, and timurids to appear when YOU do?
    Playing on a different timescale and never get to see the new world or just wanting to change your timescale?
    Click here to read the solution
    Annoyed at laggy battles? Check this thread out for your performance needs
    Got low fps during siege battles in particular? This tutorial is for you
    Want to play M2TW as a Vanilla experience minus many annoying bugs? Get VanillaMod Visit the forum Readme
    Need improved and faster 2H animations? Download this! (included in VanillaMod 0.93)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO