Results 1 to 30 of 41

Thread: For what it's worth: cancer cure announced

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #24
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: For what it's worth: cancer cure announced

    Quote Originally Posted by FactionHeir View Post
    They also only used small doses of the transporter bacterium.

    Problems that I can envision with it:
    - Bacterium mutates
    - Comes into contact with wild S. typhimurium resulting in some funky combinations, none of which would be pleasant
    - High toxicity in larger doses, which would be required for humans, either from drug overdose or transporter leak, resulting in drug floating free in the body
    - Targeting may be a bit off - results in hitting other fast growing cells or cells with that particular receptor
    - Patient with auto immune disease
    - Questionable how to get the bacterium out again once you pump someone up with it
    - Bacterium gets infected by one of many virii, altering its function
    On the upside, the result is said to be 100% in mice which they seeded with humane carcinoma. One hundred percent, now that is promising as animal trials go. Of course they didn't mention the size of N in this trial or the results of other trials that may have been less than perfect. And for all we know it make take another 25 years to fine-tune the targeting of the drug.

    And blah blah, who are we to know anyway? I just hope this isn't some stupid hoax to begin with.
    Last edited by Adrian II; 06-30-2009 at 08:11.
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO