KOTF OOC Thread

**Ignoramus** · 09-08-2009, 12:08

Anyway, if there is a rule dispute, then the king has the call. So if the rule is ambiguous, then it's up to Tristan to decide.

I had wondered about this, but considered it alright as no one in the Order had mentioned it while discussing whether I'd run or not.

**AussieGiant** · 09-08-2009, 13:08

Again I certainly agree Igno,

There have been many things done which if challenged would probably have held. If no one complains then that is part of the IC aspect to it.

There is a risk involved.

You don't want to annoy the King for example. Leave that to others and make sure you're working behnid the scenes.

**Ignoramus** · 09-08-2009, 13:28

Thanks for the signature advice, Ituralde! I finally got it to work to my satisfaction.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 09-08-2009, 13:34

Originally Posted by OverKnight

The proposed amendment could be abused by an adventuresome Seneschal. For example if we somehow acquired Scotland in a trade, even if no one but the Seneschal wished to acquire it, under this proposal, the new lands would automatically be part of the Realm.

Yes, something like this would never happen. Scotland of all places! But I use the example to show my point.

Well done.

**OverKnight** · 09-08-2009, 13:40

Being the game Historian has its advantages.

**Ituralde** · 09-08-2009, 13:46

I don't think anyone could forget that!

**ULC** · 09-08-2009, 13:47

I hope it passes - this way, when I am Seneschal, I'll buy Moscow and Novgorod, for personal reasons and issues of National Security 800 years from now.