It's a defense of euthanasia, and if anything, hints strongly that it's the preferable course of action.
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
Do we really need to delove to semantics games? Would you really argue that a couple that refused to feed their 6 month-old child was "exercising their right to make a decision of quality of life for a loved one"?
It's not semantics, there are very significant legal differences between refusal of medical treatment and euthanasia. I believe part of your problem with this document comes from a confusion between those two separate issues.
Bookmarks