Results 1 to 30 of 70

Thread: Net Neutrality Paradigm Shift

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Net Neutrality Paradigm Shift

    Quote Originally Posted by drone View Post
    The principle of net neutrality from Wiki:

    This would prevent ISPs from filtering or slowing content from some sources, which is censorship either in content or bandwidth form.
    It's certainly not censorship.
    The imagine scenario, of an ISP slowing access to youtube or something, is because youtube uses a huge amount of bandwidth and pays for none of it.

    In the US, if I'm not mistaken ISPs are generally considered common carriers, which means they are not responsible for the content transmitted on their lines because they are supposed to be ignorant of it. Filtering or access tiers breaks this.

    If net neutrality is ditched, essentially the major content providers and ISPs will collude and turn the internet into what TV is today. ISPs will be able to extort money from sites, and the independent wackiness of the internet will disappear.
    If that's so, why hasn't it happened already? Net neutrality can't be ditched because we've never had it. The non-net-neutrality environment is what has led to today's internet.

    I think getting the government involved in telling companies how to run the internet would be much, much worse.

    You are making the assumption that people have choices in their ISPs. Many areas are stuck with either random dialup services, or their cable company.
    Any figures on just how many people don't have any choice?

    So on the federal, state and local level, government is all over the internet, either preserving or creating local monopolies.
    Well, gee, if we got the government out of that then there would be less monopolies, huh? I don't see how you proving government intervention in the market is bad makes the case for more government intervention. I mean, what you linked to is a clear reason to keep the government out of the internet.

    Because the government screws thing up.

    Especially, especially, for an imagined problem like net neutrality.

    And your second link is eleven years old.

    Oh, and this isn't a bill, it's being imposed without any legislation by the FCC.

    CR
    Last edited by Crazed Rabbit; 10-22-2009 at 17:24.
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO