Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
It's certainly not censorship.
The imagine scenario, of an ISP slowing access to youtube or something, is because youtube uses a huge amount of bandwidth and pays for none of it.
Youtube does pay for bandwidth. The more hits it gets, the more it has to pay.

Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
If that's so, why hasn't it happened already? Net neutrality can't be ditched because we've never had it. The non-net-neutrality environment is what has led to today's internet.
Comcast has already tried packet filtering on P2P traffic and is getting slapped for it. At the moment, the broadband ISPs are whining because they have falsely advertised "SuperBandwidth X" to their customers, and are now hitting their actual limits because peak usage is up.

Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
I think getting the government involved in telling companies how to run the internet would be much, much worse.
True to a point. But a cartel is worse.

If an ISP can't handle the traffic, they need to either upgrade their network, charge per byte, or cap overall bandwidth per user. And be upfront about it.