I am in love!

[Ice]

Vuk, how anyone can defend this woman is beyond me. Thank you to all who saved me the time of even opening the article.

[drone]

Once upon a time I thought she trully was one of these american nutjobs completely out of touch with reality, but I'm more and more convinced she's just a real-life professional troll.

Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!

And she's a very well paid troll at that.

[Vuk]

****

First of all, your posting manner is sickening (esp the rape fantasy), and I have reported your post. That aside, I will do my best to answer you in a more respectful way than you cared to answer me.
First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility. If that is your attempt to one up Ann, you did a really poor job. I will try to make you understand this, this is NOT the Soviet Union. We do not brutalize or rape someone because we do not like their opinions. (nor do we torture them or send them through re-education). Guess what? If everyone had the right to brutalize everyone who wrote anything that they did not like, no one would ever write anything, because everyone thinks that something is garbage. That is the reason that we let trash heads like Moore write and make movies. It is his right (something we respect in America)
If you are truly convinced that the government should punish people who publish what they do not like, then maybe you should join Putin in thinking that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a tragedy.

No not everyone is prejudices is a bigot, however using that as your first line of defense and adding in your post history it becomes pretty clear.

I have no illusions. People have prejudices but simply becuase they have them doesn't mean they should use them.

Coulter is a retarded Bos-Wash blueblood whom has never had to work a day in her life. Her entire life has been handed to her on a platter and she sits on her ivory tower passing judgements.

Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

[HoreTore]

First of all, your posting manner is sickening (esp the rape fantasy), and I have reported your post. That aside, I will do my best to answer you in a more respectful way than you cared to answer me.
First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility. If that is your attempt to one up Ann, you did a really poor job. I will try to make you understand this, this is NOT the Soviet Union. We do not brutalize or rape someone because we do not like their opinions. (nor do we torture them or send them through re-education). Guess what? If everyone had the right to brutalize everyone who wrote anything that they did not like, no one would ever write anything, because everyone thinks that something is garbage. That is the reason that we let trash heads like more write and make movies. It is his right (something we respect in America)
If you are truly convinced that the government should punish people who publish what they do not like, then maybe you should join Putin in thinking that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a tragedy.



Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

Well, I can certainly see where your fascination of Ann Coulter comes from....

[Strike For The South]

Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

Considering Coulter has readily adimtted to all those things in my post (save reatard) I'm merley parroting her.

But I guess you can just go back to telling us how to butcher cows or about our food when it's not only blatanly obvious you know nothing about the subject but simply post what you think is right as undispuitable facts.

[Vuk]

Considering Coulter has readily adimtted to all those things in my post (save reatard) I'm merley parroting her.

But I guess you can just go back to telling us how to butcher cows or about our food when it's not only blatanly obvious you know nothing about the subject but simply post what you think is right as undispuitable facts.

umm...wow. First of all, Coulter did not admit that.
Second of all, I never posted a drrned thing about butchering cows. The only reference I made to butchering is that I had done it before (and it was sheep, not cows). Also, you are only supposed to post in English in this part of the forum, so I would suggest using spell check. I am not making a catty dig there, I merely mean to petition you to stop making it so hard for me to understand your umm...posts...

(5 ridiculous mistakes in the small post you just made. I do not insist that you use perfect English, nor think less of you if you don't, but do make an effort.)

EDIT: I only bring up your ummm...spelling to show to you that you do make mistakes like other people Strike (and ones that could be easily avoided). You insinuate that I am a "bigotted moron" because of a mistake that you believe I made (when I did not even). By that same logic big guy, you are yourself. I have yet only countered your hostile accusations, and the atmosphere keeps getting more and more hostile. How about making an effort to be civil?

[seireikhaan]

First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility..

Bias, opinion, and hostility are all that comprise Ms. Coulter's dialogues. How you can dismiss comments like "machete armed savages" and "Its always something with Muslims", and then rip into someone over a rape comment is quite hypocritical. Both are entirely uncalled for.

[johnhughthom]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

[Vuk]

Bias, opinion, and hostility are all that comprise Ms. Coulter's dialogues. How you can dismiss comments like "machete armed savages" and "Its always something with Muslims", and then rip into someone over a rape comment is quite hypocritical. Both are entirely uncalled for.

A: Her's was humour, his was pure hostility.
B: He was posting that to show me how much better he could do than her.
C: A comment about "punishing" someone's groin is a heck of a lot worse than anything Coulter said in that article.

[HoreTore]

When someone plays the part of the grammar Nazi, that person better make damn sure that his post is free of spelling errors.

And you failed, Vuk. Even as a non-native english speaker, I counted 4 spelling errors in your post.

Please, think of the childrenz! Put some effort into your posts.

[drone]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

The point is to rile up everyone to the left of, say, Rush Limbaugh. And to get site hits. This is what trolls do.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

Once upon a time that was true. Latterly, vitriol and peurile one-upsmanship seems to suffice.

As you are a European and they still have at least some newspapers/journalists over there, I will excuse your limited knowledge of the nadir to which American political commentary has sunk. After all, you're still exposed to people who can make and argument....at least some of the time.

[Vuk]

When someone plays the part of the grammar Nazi, that person better make damn sure that his post is free of spelling errors.

And you failed, Vuk. Even as a non-native english speaker, I counted 4 spelling errors in your post.

Please, think of the childrenz! Put some effort into your posts.

A: I am not being a grammar Nazi, I brought it up because he was saying that I made a mistake (which I did not) and didn't qualify it as opinion (which I actually did, because I said "When I butcher animals), and that makes me a bigoted moron. I was simply pointing out to him the flaws in his logic. I am certainly not a 'grammar Nazi'. The French guy above made tons of mistakes, and I did not point even one out.
B: As I said, there is nothing wrong with making mistakes, I am not saying that that makes someone stupid, but people should make an effort so that they can be understood (if only for their own good).
C: It is hard for you to compare my grammar and spelling to SFTS's. I make a mistake now and again, once and a while, just like everyone else. Strike does not even make an effort, and it hurts ones eyes to read his posts. With a non-Native English speaker I am more understanding, but it seems a little arrogant that someone that educated would not even make the smallest effort.

[Strike For The South]

umm...wow. First of all, Coulter did not admit that.
Second of all, I never posted a drrned thing about butchering cows. The only reference I made to butchering is that I had done it before (and it was sheep, not cows). Also, you are only supposed to post in English in this part of the forum, so I would suggest using spell check. I am not making a catty dig there, I merely mean to petition you to stop making it so hard for me to understand your umm...posts...

(5 ridiculous mistakes in the small post you just made. I do not insist that you use perfect English, nor think less of you if you don't, but do make an effort.)

EDIT: I only bring up your ummm...spelling to show to you that you do make mistakes like other people Strike (and ones that could be easily avoided). You insinuate that I am a "bigotted moron" because of a mistake that you believe I made (when I did not even). By that same logic big guy, you are yourself. I have yet only countered your hostile accusations, and the atmosphere keeps getting more and more hostile. How about making an effort to be civil?

O RLY?

Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think everybody is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it.

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/...gi?article=243 The horses mouth

Anyone can go back and read the thread. You also not knowing what olive oil is was pretty funny to.

I don't proofread my posts never have and never will.

I never called you a moron either

[CountArach]

What do you all think about this here article? Pretty accurate?

And you sir are soooo enlightened and educated and critical that you refuse to even read an article when you know someone does not agree with you. Heck, I even read the garbage that Michael Moore (on) writes.

This thread has only one actually criticism of what she wrote...which surprises me, because they usually are just all blind rejections without a bit of rebuttal.

lol, that is the problem Sarmatian, you SHOULDN'T take it seriously! Or...at least not THAT seriously. lol She uses humour a LOT in her articles. You just gotta learn when she is joking and when she is not. lol

lmao, that is the point. She uses exagerrated humour to get her points across. Don't use prejudices as a dirty word either, because anyone who says that they don't have any is either dishonest, or doesn't understand what the word means.

Observe: The retreat from an argument

[Vuk]

O RLY?



http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/...gi?article=243 The horses mouth

Anyone can go back and read the thread. You also not knowing what olive oil is was pretty funny to.

I don't proofread my posts never have and never will.

I never called you a moron either

So she thinks that white people are racist? So what? A lot are. A lot of white people think other races are inferior, as do a lot of blacks, hispanics, asians, etc. So suddenly you have a problem with her pointing out that white people can be racist?
And lol, I don't know what olive oil is? :P Give me a break, I grew up eating mostly (slightly Americanized) Italian food!

[Strike For The South]

So she thinks that white people are racist? So what? A lot are. A lot of white people think other races are inferior, as do a lot of blacks, hispanics, asians, etc. So suddenly you have a problem with her pointing out that white people can be racist?!

No there not. And it just shows that she has no interaction with normal people if she thinks that way. The people who generally think most people are racist are ones whom have never really been in contact with other races.

And lol, I don't know what olive oil is? :P Give me a break, I grew up eating mostly (slightly Americanized) Italian food

Well this speaks for itself.

[Vuk]

No there not. And it just shows that she has no interaction with normal people if she thinks that way. The people who generally think most people are racist are ones whom have never really been in contact with other races.




Well this speaks for itself.

A: You have before said something very similar Strike, so you should check twice before calling the kettle...um...white.
B: Racist ideas run a lot deeper than you think. Mostly they are just harmless beliefs that other races are not bad, but just not as good. It doesn't mean that most people are hateful, simply that many people hold racist ideas to whatever extent. I don't know about you, but in my extremely leftist environment I have noticed the condescending attitudes whites take to other races a lot. Mostly meaning well, but their beliefs often come across as arrogant. Of course though it could not simply be that she has had different experiences and known different people than you, but that because she disagrees with you that she is racist and has not had interaction with normal people. (normal people...you know, the ones Strike knows. All the others must be weirdos)
C: I never claimed to be an expert on Italian Cuisine, but I do know what olive oil is. I would like to know why you chose to make such a ridiculous, unsupported, flatly wrong, but totally dogmatic statement. Is it bigotry?

[Subotan]

I just realised upon reading this article, that I am prejudiced towards bigots.

[Strike For The South]

A: You have before said something very similar Strike, so you should check twice before calling the kettle...um...white.
B: Racist ideas run a lot deeper than you think. Mostly they are just harmless beliefs that other races are not bad, but just not as good. It doesn't mean that most people are hateful, simply that many people hold racist ideas to whatever extent. I don't know about you, but in my extremely leftist environment I have noticed the condescending attitudes whites take to other races a lot. Mostly meaning well, but their beliefs often come across as arrogant. Of course though it could not simply be that she has had different experiences and known different people than you, but that because she disagrees with you that she is racist and has not had interaction with normal people. (normal people...you know, the ones Strike knows. All the others must be weirdos)
C: I never claimed to be an expert on Italian Cuisine, but I do know what olive oil is. I would like to know why you chose to make such a ridiculous, unsupported, flatly wrong, but totally dogmatic statement. Is it bigotry?

A: ? I know in my early days here I took a pretty hardline on Illegals and I often let some of my emotions get the best of me (at 15-16 years old) but even then you couldn't call those posts "racist"

B: Racism is dragging a man behind a truck or hanging him from a tree. I really don't know what you're going on about with another one of your leftist diatrabes but real racism is fast fading in this country and is way overhyped in the media.

C: Tribesman already gave you the run along in the Hardees V Macdonald thread. Hint: It's the oily thing you dip your bread in.

[Vuk]

A: ? I know in my early days here I took a pretty hardline on Illegals and I often let some of my emotions get the best of me (at 15-16 years old) but even then you couldn't call those posts "racist"

B: Racism is dragging a man behind a truck or hanging him from a tree. I really don't know what you're going on about with another one of your leftist diatrabes but real racism is fast fading in this country and is way overhyped in the media.

C: Tribesman already gave you the run along in the Hardees V Macdonald thread. Hint: It's the oily thing you dip your bread in.

A-B: As you well know, there are many, many definitions of racism. I had assumed that since we were talking about Ann's use of the word we were going by the definition that she uses in her articles. Otherwise I do not even see why we bother having this conversation if we are going to use our own definitions to argue moot points. Have you ever measure racism scientifically? No? Neither have I! (guess that we do have something in common. You know what that means? We each have only our own, quite different, experiences to go on. So why do you insult me because my experiences have been different than yours? Not your opinion, so it must be wrong? What is the point of arguing then. Why don't we just build our own little fortresses and defend our sacred beliefs with our lives?! Thanks anyway, but I prefer to have rational debate and agree to disagree.

C: Here is a good example of you doing something that you would call me a bigoted moron for. Maybe you should form your own opinions of my posts instead of taking them from Tribesman. Sure, it was mostly olive oil (something I obviously knew), but calling it 'olive oil' is about as smart as calling a loaf of bread flour!! (or a bowl of dip 'sour cream') Of course someone knows there is flour in bread, but that doesn't mean that they know the name of the bread or what else is in it. You are ignoring something called "all the other ingredients"!! All the spices and crap floating in it and mixed in with it. Olive oil is only one part of it. Pardon me as I go ride my alternator to town. Got any more examples of my stupidity? I would love to hear them too.

[Ser Clegane]

I guess that's why we generally recommend to make more meaningful opening posts - instead of just linking to an article.

Helps to get an actual content-driven debate started intstaed of another thread that just eveolves around cheap shots and personal attacks.

Locked.