Did you actually read the article?
Let's have a look at it:
What the hell? Does anyone actually buy this? Does anyone actually blame Obama for Irak and Afghanistan?Now nearly all denizens of the Middle East want the U.S. to invade them.
As Thomas Friedman inadvertently admitted, Lebanese voters credit their recent free election, in which the voters threw out Hezbollah, to President Bush.
Brave Iranian students who protested the tyrant Ahmadinejad did so because of Iraq
But as our military under Bush showed the world in 21 days, scimitar-wielding savages are no match for the voluntary civilian troops of a free people.
She's just making points out of thin air. And then, her points are so ridiculously biased and stupid, it's not even funny to read them. Once upon a time I thought she trully was one of these american nutjobs completely out of touch with reality, but I'm more and more convinced she's just a real-life professional troll.
When a political commentary purpose is to brainwash the reader, I have every goddam right to be angry phrase deleted by moderator. But then as you said, she's not the only one doing that. She's just really good at spouting nonsense.Someone has anger issues. :P Smoke the peace pipe my man! Political commentary should not move you to that. It is their job to be angry, and ours to sit back and laugh.
When a political commentator writes nonsense, he should be publicly humiliated. This job is way too easy: any moron can write whatever goes through his mind without ever facing the consequences of his own crap.
As for something more correct about Afghanistan:
- Nobody cared about it because everyone focused on Irak
- Things got pretty bad while people focused on Irak
- People realize it and go "ZOMG".
Note that it's also shorter, less biased and probably more accurate than everything produced by Ann Coulter throughout her whole life (despite being a mere oversimplification).
Bookmarks