I am in love!

[Strike For The South]

lmao SFTS! Do you not recognize the irony there!? You prejudice makes you believe that anyone with prejudices is a bigot! Do you not recognize your prejudice right there? You have shown your prejudices sooo many times on this forum (as has everyone). If you equated that with bigotry, then EVERYONE in the world would be a bigot. lmao

Passage deleted by moderator.

I have no illusions. People have prejudices but simply becuase they have them doesn't mean they should use them.

Coulter is a retarded Bos-Wash blueblood whom has never had to work a day in her life. Her entire life has been handed to her on a platter and she sits on her ivory tower passing judgements.

[Vuk]

****

First of all, your posting manner is sickening (esp the rape fantasy), and I have reported your post. That aside, I will do my best to answer you in a more respectful way than you cared to answer me.
First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility. If that is your attempt to one up Ann, you did a really poor job. I will try to make you understand this, this is NOT the Soviet Union. We do not brutalize or rape someone because we do not like their opinions. (nor do we torture them or send them through re-education). Guess what? If everyone had the right to brutalize everyone who wrote anything that they did not like, no one would ever write anything, because everyone thinks that something is garbage. That is the reason that we let trash heads like Moore write and make movies. It is his right (something we respect in America)
If you are truly convinced that the government should punish people who publish what they do not like, then maybe you should join Putin in thinking that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a tragedy.

No not everyone is prejudices is a bigot, however using that as your first line of defense and adding in your post history it becomes pretty clear.

I have no illusions. People have prejudices but simply becuase they have them doesn't mean they should use them.

Coulter is a retarded Bos-Wash blueblood whom has never had to work a day in her life. Her entire life has been handed to her on a platter and she sits on her ivory tower passing judgements.

Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

[HoreTore]

First of all, your posting manner is sickening (esp the rape fantasy), and I have reported your post. That aside, I will do my best to answer you in a more respectful way than you cared to answer me.
First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility. If that is your attempt to one up Ann, you did a really poor job. I will try to make you understand this, this is NOT the Soviet Union. We do not brutalize or rape someone because we do not like their opinions. (nor do we torture them or send them through re-education). Guess what? If everyone had the right to brutalize everyone who wrote anything that they did not like, no one would ever write anything, because everyone thinks that something is garbage. That is the reason that we let trash heads like more write and make movies. It is his right (something we respect in America)
If you are truly convinced that the government should punish people who publish what they do not like, then maybe you should join Putin in thinking that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a tragedy.



Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

Well, I can certainly see where your fascination of Ann Coulter comes from....

[Strike For The South]

Shouldn't use prejudices hey? You used at least five in the post you just made. Sorry Strike, but now you are coming across as a hypocrite.

EDIT: and thank you for calling me a bigot. I think though that if someone was gonna throw insinuations around, they would have a much better basis looking at your own posting history. We could say this back and forth, how about agreeing not to scream "BIGOT!!@@!!!" at each other when we get frustrated? If makes us look rather bigotted when we start doing that.

Considering Coulter has readily adimtted to all those things in my post (save reatard) I'm merley parroting her.

But I guess you can just go back to telling us how to butcher cows or about our food when it's not only blatanly obvious you know nothing about the subject but simply post what you think is right as undispuitable facts.

[Vuk]

Considering Coulter has readily adimtted to all those things in my post (save reatard) I'm merley parroting her.

But I guess you can just go back to telling us how to butcher cows or about our food when it's not only blatanly obvious you know nothing about the subject but simply post what you think is right as undispuitable facts.

umm...wow. First of all, Coulter did not admit that.
Second of all, I never posted a drrned thing about butchering cows. The only reference I made to butchering is that I had done it before (and it was sheep, not cows). Also, you are only supposed to post in English in this part of the forum, so I would suggest using spell check. I am not making a catty dig there, I merely mean to petition you to stop making it so hard for me to understand your umm...posts...

(5 ridiculous mistakes in the small post you just made. I do not insist that you use perfect English, nor think less of you if you don't, but do make an effort.)

EDIT: I only bring up your ummm...spelling to show to you that you do make mistakes like other people Strike (and ones that could be easily avoided). You insinuate that I am a "bigotted moron" because of a mistake that you believe I made (when I did not even). By that same logic big guy, you are yourself. I have yet only countered your hostile accusations, and the atmosphere keeps getting more and more hostile. How about making an effort to be civil?

[HoreTore]

When someone plays the part of the grammar Nazi, that person better make damn sure that his post is free of spelling errors.

And you failed, Vuk. Even as a non-native english speaker, I counted 4 spelling errors in your post.

Please, think of the childrenz! Put some effort into your posts.

[Vuk]

When someone plays the part of the grammar Nazi, that person better make damn sure that his post is free of spelling errors.

And you failed, Vuk. Even as a non-native english speaker, I counted 4 spelling errors in your post.

Please, think of the childrenz! Put some effort into your posts.

A: I am not being a grammar Nazi, I brought it up because he was saying that I made a mistake (which I did not) and didn't qualify it as opinion (which I actually did, because I said "When I butcher animals), and that makes me a bigoted moron. I was simply pointing out to him the flaws in his logic. I am certainly not a 'grammar Nazi'. The French guy above made tons of mistakes, and I did not point even one out.
B: As I said, there is nothing wrong with making mistakes, I am not saying that that makes someone stupid, but people should make an effort so that they can be understood (if only for their own good).
C: It is hard for you to compare my grammar and spelling to SFTS's. I make a mistake now and again, once and a while, just like everyone else. Strike does not even make an effort, and it hurts ones eyes to read his posts. With a non-Native English speaker I am more understanding, but it seems a little arrogant that someone that educated would not even make the smallest effort.

[Strike For The South]

umm...wow. First of all, Coulter did not admit that.
Second of all, I never posted a drrned thing about butchering cows. The only reference I made to butchering is that I had done it before (and it was sheep, not cows). Also, you are only supposed to post in English in this part of the forum, so I would suggest using spell check. I am not making a catty dig there, I merely mean to petition you to stop making it so hard for me to understand your umm...posts...

(5 ridiculous mistakes in the small post you just made. I do not insist that you use perfect English, nor think less of you if you don't, but do make an effort.)

EDIT: I only bring up your ummm...spelling to show to you that you do make mistakes like other people Strike (and ones that could be easily avoided). You insinuate that I am a "bigotted moron" because of a mistake that you believe I made (when I did not even). By that same logic big guy, you are yourself. I have yet only countered your hostile accusations, and the atmosphere keeps getting more and more hostile. How about making an effort to be civil?

O RLY?

Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think everybody is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it.

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/...gi?article=243 The horses mouth

Anyone can go back and read the thread. You also not knowing what olive oil is was pretty funny to.

I don't proofread my posts never have and never will.

I never called you a moron either

[Vuk]

O RLY?



http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/...gi?article=243 The horses mouth

Anyone can go back and read the thread. You also not knowing what olive oil is was pretty funny to.

I don't proofread my posts never have and never will.

I never called you a moron either

So she thinks that white people are racist? So what? A lot are. A lot of white people think other races are inferior, as do a lot of blacks, hispanics, asians, etc. So suddenly you have a problem with her pointing out that white people can be racist?
And lol, I don't know what olive oil is? :P Give me a break, I grew up eating mostly (slightly Americanized) Italian food!

[Strike For The South]

So she thinks that white people are racist? So what? A lot are. A lot of white people think other races are inferior, as do a lot of blacks, hispanics, asians, etc. So suddenly you have a problem with her pointing out that white people can be racist?!

No there not. And it just shows that she has no interaction with normal people if she thinks that way. The people who generally think most people are racist are ones whom have never really been in contact with other races.

And lol, I don't know what olive oil is? :P Give me a break, I grew up eating mostly (slightly Americanized) Italian food

Well this speaks for itself.

[seireikhaan]

First of all, you missed completely what I said about humour. Second of all, your entire post is nothing but bias, opinion, and hostility..

Bias, opinion, and hostility are all that comprise Ms. Coulter's dialogues. How you can dismiss comments like "machete armed savages" and "Its always something with Muslims", and then rip into someone over a rape comment is quite hypocritical. Both are entirely uncalled for.

[johnhughthom]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

[drone]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

The point is to rile up everyone to the left of, say, Rush Limbaugh. And to get site hits. This is what trolls do.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

I still don't get the actual purpose of her article, what was she trying to say? I mean if you write an article it has a point, doesn't it?

Once upon a time that was true. Latterly, vitriol and peurile one-upsmanship seems to suffice.

As you are a European and they still have at least some newspapers/journalists over there, I will excuse your limited knowledge of the nadir to which American political commentary has sunk. After all, you're still exposed to people who can make and argument....at least some of the time.

[Vuk]

Bias, opinion, and hostility are all that comprise Ms. Coulter's dialogues. How you can dismiss comments like "machete armed savages" and "Its always something with Muslims", and then rip into someone over a rape comment is quite hypocritical. Both are entirely uncalled for.

A: Her's was humour, his was pure hostility.
B: He was posting that to show me how much better he could do than her.
C: A comment about "punishing" someone's groin is a heck of a lot worse than anything Coulter said in that article.