Thank you drone, and the other 23 users who viewed this thread.

When Philippe III of France invades Flanders again with his 4000 bagel-scoffers, I shall recite those numbers to him and watch him retreat indefinitely!

Here is another question regarding Kings, Princes, and Generals!

Many wish their heir to the throne to be in the thick of fighting and training to be an excellent ruler.

However, how many of you enjoy using your regent as general-in-chief?
Do you consider it wise to risk the effects of having your king stationed far away on the continent, fighting wars for example as the English?

Do you rather the princes do this instead?

Or is it really more efficient to mak use of those prodigious five-star royal knight units which appear once every two decades?



Especially when the game is still young, I ensure that every prince is out in the battlefield, and I usually have all the brothers in my first major army as a potent cavalry arm in any case.
But certainly as England, once I began warring with France, the king never left Britannia.

Is it better to leave him in Wessex or should I ship him out to Tolosa immediately?