Welcome to the Forum. Consider that best portrayal just means least inaccurate, not point-on accurate. As a historian nothing inaccurate will ever satisfy me. I have described elsewhere, perhaps in the early parts of this very thread, why I consider the depiction inaccurate. I am too lazy to do so again, sorry.Nonsense. The battles in Rome are probably the best portrayal of late republican Roman warfare.
I am not certain what you mean, but the essay is talking about modern wars and why the films depicting them are inaccurate. It sparked an interesting debate on H-War on the pros and cons of war films, but this too concerns modern wars- especially WWII.Mac, what are you trying to imply when you say "modern though"? Those who fought wars during the Bronze and Iron ages, as far as I know, were also of the species Homo sapiens.
See my reply to VonVince.At least that battle scene makes sense. The first one I ever see where the legionaries know to keep their rank and raise their scutum to protect them from stroks from above and stab the enemies in abdomen and thighs.
Bookmarks