But that involves reading. And in case your understanding of how one builds an argument is vastly different from mine; all I saw in those 2 paragraphs were the reasons why Google considers the attack to haver originated/ordered from within Chinese government [basically their argument is that it looks like it was one party from within China harvesting all these sources at once; and the only the only party which would be interested in doing so would be (connected to) the Chinese intelligence services] -- and not some other individual hackers or organizations.
There is actually nothing about censorship per se; it is all about what they perceive as breach of contract/violation of trust [the implied argument being that Google and Chinese government had settled on a modus operandi that was now side-stepped by China].
Bookmarks