Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Question about a Unit attribute

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #16

    Default Re: Question about a Unit attribute

    Don't get me wrong, I switch my cavalry to secondaries as well. I'm just saying that the high lethality lances are the best against horses or TABs at the cataphract level of armor.

    I tend to avoid sending my heavy cav to fight AI opponent heavy cav (though I have no qualms about it in MP, if I can ever figure out how to use hamachi) because heavy cav tend to have high armounts of armor. With armor halved (by AI default lances) they can be comparable to some medium cavalry like Tarabostes. IMO I'd prefer to preserve my heavy cavalry for use against stationary general units or heavy infantry/pikes and let axemen and Dahae deal with cataphract cavalry. High skill dampens the deadly effect of AP, and on top of all they're much much cheaper than heavy cav or other cataphract cav.

    I don't have any fast units able to take their charge however, but a slight skirmish from the charge usually changes "charging" to "pursuing" and makes them much easier to deal with a split second later....

    That and I don't trust any pikemen without axes to deal with cataphract cavalry. None at all. Pantodapoi Phalangitai and Machimoi are probably the only pikemen I use when facing off against that sort of cavalry. I learned my lesson the hard way when the Baktrian BG caused huge casualties to my Agryspides but got slaughtered mainly by my Pantodapoi Phalangitai right next to the Agryspides. Both took significant casualties but one was cheaper and much easier to replace....
    Last edited by Grade_A_Beef; 01-26-2010 at 20:18.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO