Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Two Pontos questions.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    iudex thervingiorum Member athanaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lusitania
    Posts
    1,114

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    @HunGeneral: It's expect, not accept. Since you were correcting spelling anyway. I would be interested in that, too.


    the do a better job than the pantodapoi are less cost-intensive than the elite ones but I for my self find a silver'chevroned pandodapoi' better than those, at least in puncto valuability.
    Depends on the challenge. Sometimes it is better to have the Pandas because of their AP secondaries (although they are useless on walls).


    However, they have less morale and lower stats in general than any of the other elite phalanxes. In fact their stats are more comparable to the Pezhetairoi than to Agryaspides, although they are still better than Pezhetairoi.
    They are basically identical to the Makedonian Heavy Phalanx (Hysteroi Pezhetairoi), stat wise.




    Swêboz guide for EB 1.2
    Tips and Tricks for New Players
    from Hannibal Khan the Great, Brennus, Tellos Athenaios, and Winsington III.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    actually, iirc, Pontos was never penetrated by Alexander. as of language i thought they speak Greek in game, and so do the Armenians?

  3. #3
    Junior Member Member fraoula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    50 stadia from Demetrias
    Posts
    51

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarkiss View Post
    actually, iirc, Pontos was never penetrated by Alexander. as of language i thought they speak Greek in game, and so do the Armenians?
    Of course they were not penetrated by Alexander. I said "conquered" because they accepted Alexander as their conqueror-liberator pretty much like the Judeans or the Egyptians.
    However they do not give orders in Greek. If you select the Gen. Bodyguard they speak in Persian(?) even after the Pontikoi Strategoi reform. Same for the Armenians altough that is not wrong.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by fraoula View Post
    Of course they were not penetrated by Alexander. I said "conquered" because they accepted Alexander as their conqueror-liberator pretty much like the Judeans or the Egyptians.
    However they do not give orders in Greek. If you select the Gen. Bodyguard they speak in Persian(?) even after the Pontikoi Strategoi reform. Same for the Armenians altough that is not wrong.
    As heirs to the Achaemenid (SP?) throne, these two aforementioned factions rightfully speak Persian when you click on their bodyguards.
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  5. #5

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by fraoula View Post
    Of course they were not penetrated by Alexander. I said "conquered" because they accepted Alexander as their conqueror-liberator pretty much like the Judeans or the Egyptians.
    However they do not give orders in Greek. If you select the Gen. Bodyguard they speak in Persian(?) even after the Pontikoi Strategoi reform. Same for the Armenians altough that is not wrong.
    Yes it is wrong. Armenians are not Persian, and do not speak Farsi. Armenians speak Armenian, which is an independent branch of the Indo-European language tree, with the closest relative being Greek. The reason they speak Farsi in the game, is because it is a place holder until We finish off an Armenian voice mod (which foot and I had been working on before EB1 was released)

  6. #6

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by artavazd View Post
    Yes it is wrong. Armenians are not Persian, and do not speak Farsi. Armenians speak Armenian, which is an independent branch of the Indo-European language tree, with the closest relative being Greek. The reason they speak Farsi in the game, is because it is a place holder until We finish off an Armenian voice mod (which foot and I had been working on before EB1 was released)
    Arto have you two finished that by the way? I was wondering if it was going to be released...
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  7. #7

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by vartan View Post
    Arto have you two finished that by the way? I was wondering if it was going to be released...
    most likely for EB2

  8. #8

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by artavazd View Post
    most likely for EB2
    Thanks axper. Looking forward to it. (It's about time we hear something familiar xD )
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  9. #9

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by artavazd View Post
    most likely for EB2
    aye! what would it be, grakan, ashkharabar? or can you make it grabar by any chance?

    vartan, why do you write axper, when it should be akhper? just curios. i've seen that the same way nakharar, gets written as naxarar. that make things more confusing for those who dont speak the language and isnt correct.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Two Pontos questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by fraoula View Post
    Of course they were not penetrated by Alexander. I said "conquered" because they accepted Alexander as their conqueror-liberator pretty much like the Judeans or the Egyptians.
    i said penetrated for a reason for that would involve a deeper degree of influence. he did not penetrate into Armenia either, it was ruled by proxy and "conquered" only on paper, so to speak. local dynasts remain in power and no foreign garrisons were stationed etc. that in its turn did not have the same after effect as we can observe in Persia itself were large Greek migration occured and communities intyermingled and cultures influenced each other to a considerable degree and so on and so forth.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO