Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

  1. #1
    Member Member Badass Buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    70

    Default The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Hey, many times lurker, first time poster. Is there anyway to conquer the settlement (Teherazza, I think) in the south-western corner of the Sahara? I sent a spy, but there's impassible terrain, and I don't want to send an army down there only to find out after 20 turns that it's impossible to get to. While I realize it's probably not worth it, I'm an completist about these things, and having that one settlement free when I've got everything else in Africa is bugging me. Thanks.

  2. #2
    They call me Flavius Member Belisarius II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Windy City
    Posts
    180

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    You can only take the settlement by modding the files. Your not supposed to take it anyway, because many of the triggers in the game are set in this settlement.
    "Possunt quia posse videntur." - Virgil - "They can because they think they can."

  3. #3
    Sovereign of all England! Member Donkey Kong Champion Arthur, king of the Britons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    King Arthur's Court at Camelot
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Or use the move_character console command.


    King Arthur's Court at Camelot

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Marble bust of Arthouros the Divider, first man to pass a Koinon Law since the foundation of the Alliance.


  4. #4

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Quote Originally Posted by Belisarius II View Post
    You can only take the settlement by modding the files. Your not supposed to take it anyway, because many of the triggers in the game are set in this settlement.
    Seconded. Question to add: Will taking the settlement "ruin" the game by stopping certain scripts from running?
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  5. #5

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Yes. Make sure that Tehrazza is the VERY LAST settlement you ever want to conquer in your campaign.

    You should take that town, save the game, and then not reload it again unless it's simply to gloat over your conquest of the entire known world.

  6. #6
    Member Megas Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Prairie Grasslands
    Posts
    5,040

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Why would someone blitz the map, anyways? Talk about BORING, you know?

  7. #7
    Klibanophoros Ton Rhomaioktono Member Duguntz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Iasi, Romania
    Posts
    766

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    WEell, for a good LOL i'd like to see some Duguntiz or Botaroas in the south sahara! hahahahaha! Just imagining their face... ''Heu... chief... the guys and me... were just wondering if you didn't pursued the celts... a bit far?''
    Opinions are like bacteries : we all have, but it's better to keep them for ourself... (By me!)

    generously given by Nachtmeister
    generously given by Macilrille for Sweboz combat tactics
    Generously given by Brennus




  8. #8
    Σέλευκος Νικάτωρ Member Fluvius Camillus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands!
    Posts
    1,078

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Quote Originally Posted by Badass Buddha View Post
    Hey, many times lurker, first time poster. Is there anyway to conquer the settlement (Teherazza, I think) in the south-western corner of the Sahara? I sent a spy, but there's impassible terrain, and I don't want to send an army down there only to find out after 20 turns that it's impossible to get to. While I realize it's probably not worth it, I'm an completist about these things, and having that one settlement free when I've got everything else in Africa is bugging me. Thanks.
    Been there... Did that (Maks)

    BTW, how come I can see the city, like I own a watchtower around there or something?

    ~Fluvius
    Quote Originally Posted by Equilibrius
    Oh my god, i think that is the first time in human history that someone cares to explain an acronym that people expect everybody to know in advance.
    I lived for three years not knowing what AAR is.

    Completed Campaigns: Epeiros (EB1.0), Romani (EB1.1), Baktria (1.2) and Arche Seleukeia
    1x From Olaf the Great for my quote!
    3x1x<-- From Maion Maroneios for succesful campaigns!
    5x2x<-- From Aemilius Paulus for winning a contest!
    1x From Mulceber!

  9. #9
    Member Member Badass Buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington
    Posts
    70

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Cool. Thank you for your help.

  10. #10

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Quote Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah View Post
    Why would someone blitz the map, anyways? Talk about BORING, you know?
    Didn't FC do this with various factions, though? I'm sure FC is a bit infamous for that, nowadays!
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  11. #11
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Quote Originally Posted by Duguntz View Post
    WEell, for a good LOL i'd like to see some Duguntiz or Botaroas in the south sahara! hahahahaha! Just imagining their face... ''Heu... chief... the guys and me... were just wondering if you didn't pursued the celts... a bit far?''


    Actually, I don't think taking the city will interfere with the script as long as you leave the "buildings" standing. However, you are not supposed to go there anyway, so...
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  12. #12

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post


    Actually, I don't think taking the city will interfere with the script as long as you leave the "buildings" standing. However, you are not supposed to go there anyway, so...
    Can you elaborate on what you mean when you say "you are not supposed to go there anyway" ? I understand that not touching the buildings will leave the scripts alone, and that one cannot MOVE his or her armies there without cheating, so WHY is that exactly? Is it a "historic" reason? Because I wish to rewrite history!
    EB Online Founder | Website
    Former Projects:
    - Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack

    - Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
    - EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
    - Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)

  13. #13
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The Settlement In The South-Western Sahara.

    Because it's impossible to march an army across the Sahara and then embark on a campaign of conquest. Even if your army managed to survive the trek, they would be in no shape to fight a battle.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO