Honestly, that's as silly as Idaho's opposing bias.
A movement for particular values imposes the system which best suits its interests, e.g. A working class communist movement imposes a communist dictatorship. A monarchist/aristocratic movement imposes an autocratic system. A middle class movement imposes a "democracy".
There are exceptions and these are traditionaly due to neccessary measures taken to tighter enforce/preserve the movement's interests in the face of a strong challenge to them (e.g. the French revolution turning into a dictatorship during la terreur). Ironically these bourgeoi movements have often stepped away from democratic rule as a measure to preserve it in the long term.
Bookmarks