Proposal for slingers

[Trve Leveller]

@Geala:

Please do you a favour and don't take the cited article too seriously. The two firing modes are mere speculation. Perhaps interesting for a game however.

To a degree everything is speculation.
Those two firemodes are physically possible, make sense from a tactical perspective and are described by period sources.

Because a stone is a big projectile.

Slingstones actually arent. Thats why he talks about biconial sling stones. Their shape closer resembles that of almonds than that of a ball.

Do you believe anything shot from a sling could penetrate with 2 footponds (2,72 Joule)?

The 2 footpounds dont refer to the slingstone, thats a general number (although I agree it has to be linked to an area).
The article says, a slingstone has an impact energy of 82 footpounds (111,52 Joule).
So this is completly different from what you concluded from this part.
You concluded its says a round ball can penetrate the human body with 2 fp
when in fact it says a small biconial stone can penetrate human tissue with 82 fps.

Xenophon tells us too that it penetrates and disappears in the tissue. That means in many cases a superficial wound.

Maybe I am misreading your post, but if it disappears in human tissue, how can one conclude that this is a superficial wound?
I am not saying that a sling is a superweapon that goes through human bodies like a hot knife through butter but if a projectile completly disappears in a body, this is more than a scratch.

That the author compares the sling with a .45 ACP pistol is only the peak of painfulness in this article.

I am sceptical about this part as well.

But add armor and shields ...

I agree on shields but not on armor. Most armour of the EB timeframe is flexible and thus blunt damadge will injure or kill an enemy without destroying his armor. And its also quite effective against non flexible armour. The Conquistadors really had a hard time fighting Inca slingers because their stones stunned and injured even those, who wore steel plate armours.

There is a reason that slings were used only on small scales.

Yes there is. It is limited training. Towards history people always moved toward ranged weapons that require less training.
The earliest crossbows were weaker than contemporary bows, but still they replaced them largely. It only takes a week of training to achieve skill with a crossbow, but it takes years to become a good archer. The first handguns were weaker than crannequin arbalests, but still they replaced them because handguns require even less training than crossbows.
It might be a similiar case with the slingshot. It's use requires even more experience than that of the bow and if you are doing it wrong you can easily wound or kill your friends standing around or behind you.


I am not an expert on ballistics or physics, I appreciate your scientific concerns and agree that the sling is no secret super weapon, but I think your critique was too harsh and did this article no justice.


@SlickNicaG69:

and certainly not enough to warrant an "elite" slinger unit, such as Elite Balearics or Elite Celtic slingers

I never talked about Elite Balearics or Elite Celtic slingers. I talked about skilled slingers which can act as sharpshooters (all Balearic slingers, herdsmen from different cultures who have some tradition of slinging) and slingers which are only slingers because they can't afford any other equipment (Accensi). They only get enough training to fire in a rough direction and not to shoot each other. But they have enough skill to project some stones into the sky to create a nasty hail. See the difference?

And because the skilled slingers need direct sight to make use of their skills, they will stand in front of other troops. Thus they will need shields, also they are not poor thus can afford shields and for example different slings for different distances.

I am not saying these slingers are "elite", their skills are a product of they work and daily life, and their military role is a product of their skills.

You wouldn't expect a Gaul to be as proficient as slinging.

Thats true, but gaulish or british herdsmen would come somewhat close to that and definitly be better than british peasants or youths who just use slings because they have nothing else.
Also infact there was a bit of a Celtic slinging culture, just look at the sheer amount of sling projectiles found at Celtic forts.

It was the custom of the day, that when a slinger achieved distinction, he was promoted to the weilding of a spear or sword.

No balearic slinger would be transformed into a full time caetratius.
What you are referring to is younger warriors, which are forced to fight as skirmisher before they can become real warriors.
And those I would put into the Accensi category.