Results 1 to 30 of 79

Thread: Poll: scale the difficulty of each campaign

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #13
    Member Member seienchin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Poll: scale the difficulty of each campaign

    Quote Originally Posted by Skuda View Post
    Hayastan is a hard faction? Maybe on VH/VH, but on H/M is pretty easy even without rushing. The same for Saka and Sauromatae.

    NB: I'm playing my own minimod where all the spearmen have -4 attack. But I think it doesn't make any difference in this case
    What?
    If you dont rush wih Saka you must wait like 40 turns to make money, even more with sauromatae and hayasdan is hell if the seleucs decide to atack you.
    It isnt impossible (I have never seen the pc beat me^^), but it is tedious as hell fighting stakc after stack.


    Anyway I hate playing all the rush or die factions, because one of the funny parts of EB is building your cities to economical greatness, which is nearly impossible the first 100turns with these factions.
    The only exception beeing the lusotans, which are easy to manage after you conquer one or two settlements.

    Anyway if this were Vanilla you would give you a*** handed to you if you had like 10 levy units and you were atacked by a fullstack of elite infantry and cavallery.
    Ebs high defense and moral system makes for intense battles, but I think its broken, when it comes to horse archers. They werent the dominant force in EBs Timeframe, but in EB they are the strongest units.
    Last edited by seienchin; 08-22-2010 at 11:09.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO