If it works, then there is not reason women can not serve in combat units if they want to, either.
My objections came from a particular experience when part of the command group with a joint taskforce in the field. (Army, Air Force, & Marine Corps)
I don’t mean gay sex, just sex in general. We had examples of both, naturally.
I have no idea whither it was the high stress of operations coupled with living outdoors and in close contact with others or just the element of danger but it did impact the mission.
There were numerous incidents of unwanted sexual advances involving both rank and file and the leadership, male and female. There were incidents of sex during operations, some in very dangerous situations.
It had an effect on both moral and resources.
Of course all these things were against regulations at the time also, but it made little difference.
Most of it was covered up as much as possible but it was a real problem.
Straight sex caused the biggest commotion but gay sex had the largest impact on security.
I am certainly not anti-sex, and could care less about the sex life of others, even in tents or curled in sleeping bags, but on duty when it makes more work for others and endangers the mission and the lives of others it is a different matter.
You can say what you want about regulations. They don’t stop the behavior, they just punish those caught.
It is all very funny when you are sitting some place safe and secure but when your life depends on those supposedly walking the perimeter it is a whole different story.
I hope the change has little or no effect on the armed forces. It is just that my opinions have been colored by some negative experiences.
Bookmarks