It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
The world was more interconnected than people think. Romans knew of the existence of China and there is written records of at least one way contact between Rome(Da Qin) and the Han Empire. India and Mesopotamia were actually quite well connected via land and coastal trade routes. The Mauryan Empire actually fought Big Grey too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurya_..._.28305_BCE.29
Wasn't there a tomb in Rome excavated recently with a skeleton bearing certain elements that were uncommon in the Mediterranean but common in East Asia.
Last edited by antisocialmunky; 02-27-2011 at 02:40.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
For other new powers in Mikra Asia, the Armenians rebelled around 317 BC, and Zipoetes of Bithynia declared himself Basileus in 297 BC (This is the date Mithridates VI Eupator counted the Pontic Regnal Era from, even though his family didn't take the title until 281 BC).
herm quintus don´t get me wrong but akosha rise to power and his pacifist aproach was what allowed seulekos and his decendents to solidify their position all up to the indian border and provided seulekeia with the elephant regiment that allowed them to stop the kelts and get the cognomem soter so all in all the thread of fate puts akosha is a very important position by enabling the seulecid to have a secure and friendly border in the east while providing them with elephants
had it been another mauryan emperor or had akosha not decided to deny war after a particulary brutal batle (10.000?) and the seulecids would have probably broken far sooner without their elephants and under the keltic pressure on the west and the indian pressure on the east
So there's a general and recent rising of new powers throwing off the Seleukid yoke in Asia Minor.
That's all well and good, but for a group of four individuals who might be in Epirus, or Phrygia, or Sicily, or Massilia, it's a footnote or a novelty item of news. I'm not setting the game on the eastern edge of Seleukid territory where that would be of critical importance. What it means is that the Seleukids are able to put more focus on the western end of their Empire, that's all.
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
I believe Carthage started to control parts of Numidia around 300 BC too...
Ervand* I of Armenia (401-344), the clever and diplomatic leader that he was, nearly succeeded in grasping the Persian Imperial throne. The leader, of Bactrian and possibly Hydarnid descent, successfully brought Mysia--and temporarily, Pergamon--and Western Armenia under the kingdom's rule. His son Ervand II (336-325) inherited the throne from his father (after an intermediary rule by Codomannus, 344-336). Ervand II led the Armenian cavalry at the famous Battle of Gaugamela (right wing). Ervand II was the first ruler of Armenia in this period in antiquity who styled himself king (more accurately, Basileus). After Ervand II comes Mithranes (325-317). Ervand III (son of Ervand II) (317-260) is who you see ruling Armenia when you start the Hayasdan campaign in Europa Barbarorum. Due to the Rome: Total War game engine and how it works most of the time, there is a very slim chance that your faction leader Ervand III will actually live to the year 260. Nevertheless, it is significant that EB includes him as well as his son, Samus, an important figure. Samus, as you may well know, later founds the important city of Shamshat (Latin: Samosata), in Commagene.
*Transliterations differ in their construction of this Armenian name. A transliteration in tune with the pronunciation of the name would be constructed as Yervand, while the transliteration I chose is in tune with the orthography behind the name, Ervand. The latter is also the construction one usually finds in most native Armenian names in Europa Barbarorum. For an example, see the faction name Hayasdan. This is, again, in tune with the orthography, even though the pronunciation-based transliteration would result in Hayastan (where the 't' represents the plain/unaspirated voiceless alveolar plosive/stop).
EB Online Founder | Website
Former Projects:
- Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack
- Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
- EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
- Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)
Bookmarks