Legalizing polygamy in Canada.....

**Andres** · 04-20-2011, 09:47

Originally Posted by Scienter

I tend to agree with you. I'm not personally wired for polygamy, but it's really none of my business if other people are. So long as everyone involved consents. There's a lot of room for abuse in this type of situation (I'm thinking about women from poor countries who marry men to move away to a better place).

Another thing that gives me pause is that groups of people could use a legal framework to get tax benefits, etc. Imagine a bunch of grad students living together and decide to get 'married' as a group to get tax benefits, etc. This is abuse of the law to me, and I don't know how the gov't would prevent such a thing from happening.

Here in Belgium, in tax law most differences between people who are married or just living together have been worked away. There's still some work to do (and certainly so in the social benefits department), but it's not impossible for the legislator to get rid of all differential treatments of people just living together and people who are married. I don't think one group should have any advantage over the other regarding tax law and social benefits. I think the circumstance of having a household together or not should be decisive. Besides, plenty of people are married and don't live together, so why should they be treated as if they are living together. Really, your marital status should be completely irrelevant when it comes to taxes and social benefits.

The legal framework should only have consequences on the private (civil? or is that the same over there; here it's "burgerrechtelijk") law level; in other words: only consequences for those in the legal framework. Marriage/living together is a strictly private affair, imo. Providing a legal framework that people can chose for seems like a no-brainer to me; living together has consequences and the state has a responsibility to at least provide some sort of framework (optional of course) to deal with those consequences (especially with the situation once the living together has ended). But that should be it.

Anyway, whatever the legal framework, getting a prenuptial is always a good idea.

**drone** · 04-20-2011, 16:05

When a marriage contract includes more than 2 people, isn't there a possibility of abuse through incorporation?

If I'm married and the wife dies, the contract is ended but for tax purposes I can "inherit" the wife's possessions for free. When I kick it, then the estate is taxed.

If I'm married to 3 wives, and one goes, what happens? Say I add a younger wife, and then we add a younger husband to the mix before I die? Can the marriage contract be extended indefinitely in this manner?

**ICantSpellDawg** · 04-24-2011, 04:54

Hahahahahaha!

I applaud polygamy being legalized! One more step to making the civil institution of marriage completely meaningless. After that, hopefully someone will try to marry each and every one of their siblings, to the point where "marriage" serves merely as a contractual agreement between parties and we drop the absurdity we call civil marriage. Religious marriage for me, please. One man, One woman, marrying one another with God's blessing. I don't respect the rest of them because why should I?

**ICantSpellDawg** · 04-24-2011, 04:57

Originally Posted by drone

When a marriage contract includes more than 2 people, isn't there a possibility of abuse through incorporation?

If I'm married and the wife dies, the contract is ended but for tax purposes I can "inherit" the wife's possessions for free. When I kick it, then the estate is taxed.

If I'm married to 3 wives, and one goes, what happens? Say I add a younger wife, and then we add a younger husband to the mix before I die? Can the marriage contract be extended indefinitely in this manner?

Get rid of it the whole thing - it's pointless!