People aren't using as much cav as they used to which is odd to me.
People aren't using as much cav as they used to which is odd to me.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Why? And what does it have to do with the changes? The cavalry is made stronger not weaker. And for some factions or situations it can make sense to bring no cav or not so many. I don't think that it's caused by the EDU changes, it's a change in mentality. People do not longer think "I can have five cav and five archers, so I have to use five of them".
‘Abdü’l-Mecīd-i evvel
Id say its caused by 20 cohorts and Gallic fear armies, suddenly, 10 units of infantry does not seem like a very good idea considering how little damage archers do to armored infantry in EB.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
[21:16:17] [Gaius - 5.115.253.115]
i m not camping , its elegant strategy of waiting
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Ok guys one suggestion about mercenary phalanx in Rome roster, ok its maybe stupid to use them for marian and imperial era but i think that there should be special rule that SPQR players can use them in camilian and polybian era right?
That sounds sensible for me.
‘Abdü’l-Mecīd-i evvel
EB Online Founder | Website
Former Projects:
- Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack
- Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
- EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
- Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)
Bookmarks