Good job


One misspelling near the end, understandably, in the section on longboats:
The kinds of longbow include, among others, drakkars and snekkjas.
and a couple of requests to improve readability: line breaks between the numbered sections and increased font size for section headings.


I'm sympathetic to the view that renaming a unit to "swordsmen" implies a unit solely equipped with swords. However it's a term that is understandable across cultures and, excepting something better turning up, would have to do.

The problem with 'mono-weaponicity' is that it could mean two things:
- all units having the same weapon - generally agreed to be uncommon, given the diversity of weapons (ie. maces and hammers, etc.) and even the range of sizes of weapons (eg. single- and two-handed versions)
- units not having secondary weapons - which I can't imagine being true for any unit. Even the lowest peasant armed with not much more than a stick probably had a knife of some sort. In a battle, anything has got to be better than bare fists.
The first interpretation could be better described as 'homo-weaponicity', but who would want to do that?

In conclusion, name them 'swordsmen' and if anyone asks explain that it covers everything from langseax to falchions, shashka to scimitars.