Here you go Fom. We were taught the concept of intersectionality in lecture, but you can put the puzzle together with these corresponding pieces. Note that they will naturally have other concepts in them, including but not limited to gender (+ the critique of so-called 'roles'), sex, and heteronormativity.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1993. “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough.” The Sciences. March/April. Pp. 20-25
Lorde, Audre. 1984. “Age, Race, Class and Sex: Women Redefining Difference.” In Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press; 114-123.
Reddy, Maureen. 1994. “Why do white people have vaginas?” In Crossing the Color Line. Rutgers University Press. Pp. 41-64.


Quote Originally Posted by Centurio Nixalsverdrus View Post
Before the French revolution people identified themselves to the region, sometimes very small, they lived in. The model CirdanDharix gave is very good imo. So people had a regional identity. That was one side. The other side were the capitals of the states, the centres of power. The seat of a dynasty, their palace. Around them lived their aristocracy and appointed officials which comprised the ruling class. In this region, the "power region", the people naturally identified much more with their state, as they saw it everyday and was often identical with their regional identification.
Never forget that these very same affiliations were imagined communities just as much as modern day nations are. Anderson's pretty important and has been for a while when it comes to nations.

Anderson, Benedict R. O., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Rev. ed. London: Verso, 2006.