Quote Originally Posted by -Stormrage- View Post
OP ? if something is good at what it is supposed to do it is not OP. And i thought u ugys were all about Historical accuracy well the falx was historically good at doing what it does "OP" as u call it. everytime i suggest somehting someone tells me "oh no sotrmrage but that is not historically accurate we dont care if its good for gameplay its not historical" . you guys are all . History is NUMBER 1 historocal accuracy is NUMBER 1. Why are you now hiding behind the banner of "for gameplay puposes" . EB isnt about fair gameplay its about historical accuracy, according to you.
Calm down buddy. I think what everyone is saying/thinks is that there needs to be some sort of a balance between the two. My only problem is that where this “line in the sand” is has not been made very clear. Historically, the legions were incredibly powerful and good at what they do. So were the elite successor phalanxes, catas, and horse archers. But if you represent they in a purely historical mindset, then the game becomes boring and loses its diversity. You have to have some balance between gameplay and history.