Results 1 to 30 of 66

Thread: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    Actually I think I have a better idea where everyone wins. I think what you should do is to model the Marian army as the one of the late Republic during the era of the civil wars while the Imperials should be modeled on the army of the 1st century AD which was slightly different. That we can can have both a more average legion and a more super legion.

    The army of the time of Marius would have had an influx of raw recruits so it would make sense that it would have many people but not stated as highly. Basically like more slightly better Hastati (call it ~1.5K-1.6K). The army of the 1st century Principate which had experienced many civil wars and reorganized into basically a super border patrol should have the the legion as a battle hardened nearly elite unit (~1.8K-2K) with many cheaper support units (~1.2K-1.4K) to help out.

    There's probably no harm in keeping the legions 200 strong while reducing support units to smaller sizes (spear auxillaries to 160 and archers to 80-120?) since atleast wikipedia quotes documents that put legionary formations as large units with auxillaries in much much smaller units.
    Last edited by antisocialmunky; 09-02-2011 at 05:00.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO