Results 1 to 30 of 66

Thread: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 09-03-2011, 15:49 #29
    antisocialmunky
    antisocialmunky is offline
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ﾟДﾟ)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974



    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    No, Vartan just said that you should just stat the equipment and ignore the man. I'm just saying that the person and skill must be considered as well.

    Rome seems quite reasonable at 1800 legions. You just need proper support units. I managed to make a working army with cavalry with 8 legions, 4 spear auxillaries, and 4 numidian archers.

    You can go ahead and make imperials better if you reduce support infantry unit costs to somewhere closer to 1400. Make all the Rome guys happy.
    Last edited by antisocialmunky; 09-03-2011 at 15:50.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO