I put it to you, in my best LA Law voice, that this is purely supposition unless you happen to be a time travelling mind reader.
Exactly our point, you seem to be trying to argue both sides here and applying either side to where it supports you, are you a politician?But did they mean it in that sentence? Which did they mean, males or humans? YOU are saying that you don't know. Maybe you should translate into german and apply some semantic subtleties to it.
Again, if it had been properly defined this could not have happened, but leaving ambiguous statements mean they are open to interpretation.Funny thing, that: in practice, it was not applied to women, slaves, Native Americans at the time...
I'm assuming that some here are either young or have never worked with law or placing contracts, this type of ambiguity happens all the time and leads to lengths negotiations and extra cost/
Oh, and Rory, you should really give up the fags, you being a doc and all.
Bookmarks