Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
Is definition #2 wrong?
Yes.

That's cool, still really don't see why this should be allowed. We have had this discussion before Sasaki. This time it worked out nicely in getting rid of a bad law. So you think it is a good process. And yet, along with this nice outcome there are going to be countless other elections where interest groups and corporations buy victories for crony capitalist policies and politicians by spamming misinformation and commercials at voters 24/7.

Hooray, everyone can speak as loud as their money can buy them, good thing it is only the people with bad ideas that have no money amiright?
You are resigning yourself to never being able to change a bad law then. The status quo will be too powerful. In elections name recognition will rule.

How much do you think can be done with commercials? How bad a law do you think a corporation could get passed?