The issue is primarily social and moral in nature, for both sides of the argument. Some people see homosexuality as immoral, some people see the denial of marriage rights to homosexual couples as immoral.
While you are obviously free to challenge this focus on the moral side of things, you need to offer some sort of refutation of it before you start calling people dummy and making points that most people regard more as tangential than disagreeable.
If you're going to take the liberty of completely redefining what they mean when they talk about certain concepts, how can you expect to engage with them?
Bookmarks