That is exactly what I was saying. And if people want in on the action that is supposed to benefit society, then why not let them in on the action so they can contribute, even if it is small? That, however, is not the same saying that it is a solution.
If so few people are gay, and it affects such a small percentile, then what is the problem? Are we scared the gay agenda is going to turn into a snowball of gay momentum and cover us with a big gay avalanche? Is it irrelevant because they are single digit representative of the population? If that is the yardstick by which we measure the worth of a cause, or a law, or a debate, then I am afraid Congress and SCOTUS just became irrelevant, and that argument itself defeats the entire spirit of DOMA to begin with, i.e. whats.the.big.deal?
Bookmarks