responding to common objections to bible

[total relism]

I never cease to be dumbfounded how much the Human race can be brainwashed into believing the most stupid of things.

If there was a rational benevolent omnipresent and omniscient (As if such a thing existed) entity and he wanted to be worshipped by all humans and subdue them to his law, he would show himself wherever to all humans and teach them his rules by himself to all humans and be clearly discernable from everything else in life, and there would be no bible and no churches since you could always speak and learn from all that such an entity knew.

Instead, every single theist religion needs to speak in metaphors such as "god shows himself in the heart of man, god is spirit and communicates through spirit in the heart." and other bullshit any person with a pair of eyes and two inches of common sense can easily disprove.

unless that is the god of the bible is that god, in witch case he does/cannot for the reasons given in the op. Not to mention as i showed in previous thread [those that have never herd of jesus], god is known to all though multiple lines that are built in to all people, many chose to reject that. This thread and objections are for those who say they reject the bible because it teaches so and so, not if there is a god, that one is coming.


by the way can you please disprove that god does not communicate with believers through spirit? me and billions of changed lives would disagree with that.